From owner-freebsd-hackers Sun Aug 11 21:05:09 1996 Return-Path: owner-hackers Received: (from root@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.5/8.7.3) id VAA29160 for hackers-outgoing; Sun, 11 Aug 1996 21:05:09 -0700 (PDT) Received: from scooter.quickweb.com (scooter.quickweb.com [199.212.134.8]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.5/8.7.3) with SMTP id VAA29141 for ; Sun, 11 Aug 1996 21:04:48 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost (mark@localhost) by scooter.quickweb.com (8.6.12/8.6.12) with SMTP id AAA00237; Mon, 12 Aug 1996 00:03:12 -0400 Date: Mon, 12 Aug 1996 00:03:12 -0400 (EDT) From: Mark Mayo To: Brian Tao cc: FREEBSD-HACKERS-L Subject: Re: Huuuuuuuuuuuge INN history.pag? In-Reply-To: Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-hackers@freebsd.org X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk On Sun, 11 Aug 1996, Brian Tao wrote: > This isn't good, is it? > > 243448 -rw-rw-r-- 1 news news 249158785 Aug 11 22:49 history > 1 -rw-rw-r-- 1 news news 123 Aug 11 22:49 history.dir > 20696 -rw-rw-r-- 1 news news 140737509515644 Aug 11 22:49 history.pag > > I know the file really isn't that large, but I presume the EOF > marker has been blown way out for some reason. The news server seems > to be running still, but this sort of thing worries me. ;-) > inn-1.4unoff3 (no mmap), 2.2-960501-SNAP. Anyone else seen this > before? I see that file size (approx.) whenever I NFS mount an AIX 3.2.5 export.. When I write a file to the NFS sever, my FreeBSD client sees that file size, but the AIX server sees the correct file size. I've always assumed it was just a disagreement between NFS implementations. I guess it's the max file size or something.. -Mark ------------------------------------------- | Mark Mayo mark@quickweb.com | | C-Soft www.quickweb.com | ------------------------------------------- "To iterate is human, to recurse divine." - L. Peter Deutsch > -- > Brian Tao (BT300, taob@io.org, taob@ican.net) > Senior Systems and Network Administrator, Internet Canada Corp. > "Though this be madness, yet there is method in't" > >