From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Apr 14 02:57:14 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3260A16A4CE; Thu, 14 Apr 2005 02:57:14 +0000 (GMT) Received: from gwmail1.grupos.com.br (gwmail1.grupos.com.br [66.90.64.125]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E2B4D43D1D; Thu, 14 Apr 2005 02:57:13 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from marcus@corp.grupos.com.br) Received: from corp.grupos.com.br (unknown [150.162.166.55]) by gwmail1.grupos.com.br (Postfix) with ESMTP id 259543C3EB; Wed, 13 Apr 2005 23:57:13 -0300 (BRT) Received: from [192.168.1.3] (unknown [200.180.6.140]) (Authenticated sender: marcus@corp.grupos.com.br) by corp.grupos.com.br (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1B508558F; Wed, 13 Apr 2005 23:57:12 -0300 (BRT) Message-ID: <425DDC09.7070802@corp.grupos.com.br> Date: Wed, 13 Apr 2005 23:57:13 -0300 Organization: Grupos Internet S/A From: Marcus Grando User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.2 (X11/20050317) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Rong-En Fan References: <200503210441.j2L4fQRB021246@svm.csie.ntu.edu.tw> <20050322084911.GA21666@heechee.tobez.org> <20050322090810.GY34807@k7.mavetju> <42401591.9090306@corp.grupos.com.br> <20050322133325.GA1849@heechee.tobez.org> <20050412213158.GA41666@svm.csie.ntu.edu.tw> In-Reply-To: <20050412213158.GA41666@svm.csie.ntu.edu.tw> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit cc: Edwin Groothuis cc: Cheng-Lung Sung cc: freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.org cc: Anton Berezin cc: sem@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: mail/policyd name conflict X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 14 Apr 2005 02:57:14 -0000 Hi, > mail/postfix-policyd-sqlgrey > mail/postfix-policyd-postgrey mail/postfix-policyd-spf mail/postfix-policyd-greylist For me is the best way. > > A bit long name? If in this case, I would suggest that we don't > touch them and just rename mail/policyd to mail/policyd-spf > and the new one will be mail/policyd (just google policyd, it is > in the second result). I don't think so. Long name is not problem. This week i send PR to rename mail/policyd to mail/postfix-policyd-spf Regards -- Marcus Grando Grupos Internet S/A marcus(at)corp.grupos.com.br