From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Apr 7 07:46:18 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8EB0D126 for ; Mon, 7 Apr 2014 07:46:18 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail.server1.bsdforen.de (bsdforen.de [82.193.243.81]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3F36534F for ; Mon, 7 Apr 2014 07:46:17 +0000 (UTC) Received: from AprilRyan.norad (iz-aix-213a.HS-Karlsruhe.DE [193.196.64.213]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.server1.bsdforen.de (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 4426285FC4; Mon, 7 Apr 2014 09:36:43 +0200 (CEST) Message-ID: <5342558B.4050902@bsdforen.de> Date: Mon, 07 Apr 2014 09:36:43 +0200 From: Dominic Fandrey User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.4.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "Dr. Peter Voigt" , freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Installing port texlive-base-20120701_10 needs staging disabled References: <20140406233108.256e8f2a@tiger2008.drpetervoigt.private> In-Reply-To: <20140406233108.256e8f2a@tiger2008.drpetervoigt.private> X-Enigmail-Version: 1.6 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 07 Apr 2014 07:46:18 -0000 On 06/04/2014 23:31, Dr. Peter Voigt wrote: > I have just tried to upgrade to texlive-base-20120701_10 on > 10.0-RELEASE. Building of print/texlive-base worked fine but > installation failed. As a shot in the dark I tried with > > portmaster -m "-DNO_STAGE" -D -G print/texlive-base I ran into this too. It either means the port does not support staging properly, or the plist is broken. In which case you just created an inconsistency. One that luckily heals with the next upgrade. -- A: Because it fouls the order in which people normally read text. Q: Why is top-posting such a bad thing? A: Top-posting. Q: What is the most annoying thing on usenet and in e-mail?