From owner-freebsd-security Thu Sep 28 07:29:37 1995 Return-Path: owner-security Received: (from root@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.6.12/8.6.6) id HAA15392 for security-outgoing; Thu, 28 Sep 1995 07:29:37 -0700 Received: from halloran-eldar.lcs.mit.edu (halloran-eldar.lcs.mit.edu [18.26.0.159]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.6.12/8.6.6) with SMTP id HAA15387 for ; Thu, 28 Sep 1995 07:29:33 -0700 Received: by halloran-eldar.lcs.mit.edu; (5.65/1.1.8.2/19Aug95-0530PM) id AA17677; Thu, 28 Sep 1995 10:27:23 -0400 Date: Thu, 28 Sep 1995 10:27:23 -0400 From: "Garrett A. Wollman" Message-Id: <9509281427.AA17677@halloran-eldar.lcs.mit.edu> To: =?KOI8-R?Q?=E1=CE=C4=D2=C5=CA_=FE=C5=D2=CE=CF=D7?= (aka Andrey A. Chernov, Black Mage) Cc: Mark Murray , security@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: Troubles with telnet encryption enabling. In-Reply-To: References: <199509280622.IAA16335@grumble.grondar.za> Sender: owner-security@FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk < said: > No, encryption is separated from kerberos there, they must go > independently (see "encrypt" command inside telnet too). > It looks like client send encryption requests > and daemon receive and parse them, but does nothing... In what key do you expect to get your data encrypted? That's why an authentication mechanism is required: it's what provides the shared secret session key. -GAWollman -- Garrett A. Wollman | Shashish is simple, it's discreet, it's brief. ... wollman@lcs.mit.edu | Shashish is the bonding of hearts in spite of distance. Opinions not those of| It is a bond more powerful than absence. We like people MIT, LCS, ANA, or NSA| who like Shashish. - Claude McKenzie + Florent Vollant