From owner-freebsd-current Tue Oct 20 09:19:38 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id JAA02613 for freebsd-current-outgoing; Tue, 20 Oct 1998 09:19:38 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from highwind.com (hurricane.highwind.com [209.61.45.50]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id JAA02608 for ; Tue, 20 Oct 1998 09:19:37 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from info@highwind.com) Received: (from info@localhost) by highwind.com (8.8.6/8.8.6) id MAA26576; Tue, 20 Oct 1998 12:18:43 -0400 (EDT) Date: Tue, 20 Oct 1998 12:18:43 -0400 (EDT) Message-Id: <199810201618.MAA26576@highwind.com> From: HighWind Software Information To: bright@hotjobs.com CC: lists@tar.com, current@FreeBSD.ORG In-reply-to: (message from Alfred Perlstein on Tue, 20 Oct 1998 11:33:19 -0400 (EDT)) Subject: Re: Another Serious libc_r problem Sender: owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Hmmm. Now we got 3 patches. I am a little wary about Alfred's "broadcast" patch. Seems premature optimization. I'd rather have something that is conservative first. Can someone with commit priviledges take a peek at this and add one of these to the source? -Rob To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message