From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Feb 4 16:45:21 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E654C16A420 for ; Sat, 4 Feb 2006 16:45:21 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from corwin@aeternal.net) Received: from amber.aeternal.net (amber.in.markiza.sk [62.168.76.21]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7315843D55 for ; Sat, 4 Feb 2006 16:45:21 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from corwin@aeternal.net) Received: from localhost (localhost.aeternal.net [127.0.0.1]) by amber.aeternal.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 536FAB90D for ; Sat, 4 Feb 2006 17:45:19 +0100 (CET) Received: from amber.aeternal.net ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (amber.aeternal.net [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 66176-03 for ; Sat, 4 Feb 2006 17:45:18 +0100 (CET) Received: from [192.168.0.30] (pleiades.aeternal.net [192.168.0.30]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by amber.aeternal.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7808BB90B for ; Sat, 4 Feb 2006 17:45:18 +0100 (CET) Message-ID: <43E4DA1F.1020007@aeternal.net> Date: Sat, 04 Feb 2006 17:45:19 +0100 From: Martin Hudec User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5 (Windows/20051201) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org References: <43E49453.3080906@infracaninophile.co.uk> <43E4BC08.1080802@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <43E4BC08.1080802@FreeBSD.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at aeternal.net Subject: Re: Default PHP version X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: corwin@aeternal.net List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 04 Feb 2006 16:45:22 -0000 Hello Alex, Alex Dupre wrote: > I don't think it's too late, but it's highly recommended to do a full > build of our ports tree with this change before it could be committed. > I've just asked portmgr to do that (and the same for mysql 5.0). I am happy that this will happen, but if I may ask - will there be php4 still around for some time in ports too? For some of us, who provide webhosting services, it may not be so easy to persuade clients to convert their applications to php5. Martin