From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG  Thu Dec 15 16:04:29 2011
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9EE4C1065670
	for <freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.org>; Thu, 15 Dec 2011 16:04:29 +0000 (UTC)
	(envelope-from avg@FreeBSD.org)
Received: from citadel.icyb.net.ua (citadel.icyb.net.ua [212.40.38.140])
	by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DAED58FC08
	for <freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.org>; Thu, 15 Dec 2011 16:04:28 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from odyssey.starpoint.kiev.ua (alpha-e.starpoint.kiev.ua
	[212.40.38.101])
	by citadel.icyb.net.ua (8.8.8p3/ICyb-2.3exp) with ESMTP id RAA00711;
	Thu, 15 Dec 2011 17:49:51 +0200 (EET) (envelope-from avg@FreeBSD.org)
Message-ID: <4EEA171F.8040408@FreeBSD.org>
Date: Thu, 15 Dec 2011 17:49:51 +0200
From: Andriy Gapon <avg@FreeBSD.org>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64;
	rv:8.0) Gecko/20111109 Thunderbird/8.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Steven Hartland <killing@multiplay.co.uk>
References: <4EE1EAFE.3070408@m5p.com><CAJ-FndDniGH8QoT=kUxOQ+zdVhWF0Z0NKLU0PGS-Gt=BK6noWw@mail.gmail.com><4EE2AE64.9060802@m5p.com><4EE88343.2050302@m5p.com><CAFHbX1+5PttyZuNnYot8emTn_AWkABdJCvnpo5rcRxVXj0ypJA@mail.gmail.com><4EE933C6.4020209@zedat.fu-berlin.de><CAPjTQNEJDE17TLH-mDrG_-_Qa9R5N3mSeXSYYWtqz_DFidzYQw@mail.gmail.com><20111215024249.GA13557@icarus.home.lan><4EE9A2A0.80607@zedat.fu-berlin.de><op.v6iv3qe5g7njmm@michael-think><4EE9C79B.7080607@phoronix.com><op.v6i1arfpg7njmm@michael-think><4EE9D214.3070906@phoronix.com><95A7C3EFE7B4406EAFF0259CD8B61D1C@multiplay.co.uk><4EE9D7B8.50209@phoronix.com>
	<575ccb9c8c7915f04d526abaa194d9f5@antiszoc.hu>
	<BA9289AA1428437799401B36CCC0C94E@multiplay.co.uk>
In-Reply-To: <BA9289AA1428437799401B36CCC0C94E@multiplay.co.uk>
X-Enigmail-Version: undefined
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.org
Subject: Re: Benchmark (Phoronix): FreeBSD 9.0-RC2 vs. Oracle Linux 6.1Server
X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code <freebsd-stable.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable>, 
	<mailto:freebsd-stable-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-stable>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-stable-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable>,
	<mailto:freebsd-stable-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 15 Dec 2011 16:04:29 -0000

on 15/12/2011 14:29 Steven Hartland said the following:
> Having a quick look at those results aren't there a few annomolies e.g. THREADED
> I/O TESTER for Oracle reports 10255.75MB/s
> 
> Which is clearly impossible for a single HD system meaning
> its basically caching the entire data set?

I think that the Stefan Esser's post in this thread has likely nailed this one.

-- 
Andriy Gapon