From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Aug 22 07:36:34 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A52AA16A4BF for ; Fri, 22 Aug 2003 07:36:34 -0700 (PDT) Received: from accms33.physik.rwth-aachen.de (accms33.physik.RWTH-Aachen.DE [137.226.46.133]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5AECD43FBD for ; Fri, 22 Aug 2003 07:36:32 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from kuku@accms33.physik.rwth-aachen.de) Received: (from kuku@localhost) by accms33.physik.rwth-aachen.de (8.11.6/8.9.3) id h7MEaSM22320; Fri, 22 Aug 2003 16:36:28 +0200 Date: Fri, 22 Aug 2003 16:36:28 +0200 From: "Christoph P. Kukulies" To: Volker Stolz Message-ID: <20030822143628.GA22309@gilberto.physik.rwth-aachen.de> References: <200308220642.h7M6gcs15131@accms33.physik.rwth-aachen.de> <20030822135901.GA66508@i2.informatik.rwth-aachen.de> <20030822140448.GA21661@gilberto.physik.rwth-aachen.de> <20030822140854.GA66708@i2.informatik.rwth-aachen.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20030822140854.GA66708@i2.informatik.rwth-aachen.de> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4i cc: riggs@rrr.de cc: "Christoph P. Kukulies" cc: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: eagle port X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 22 Aug 2003 14:36:34 -0000 On Fri, Aug 22, 2003 at 04:08:54PM +0200, Volker Stolz wrote: > > > I had to upgrade from linux_base-7.1_2 to linux_base-7.1_5: > > > > I got it working by picking up selectively the missing shared libs from > > an existing redhat 8 installation and got it finally working. > > I prefer upgrading from the FreeBSD-port... > > > > linux-eagle@menelaos [15:56:08]> sudo eagle > > > Xlib: connection to ":0.0" refused by server > > > Xlib: No protocol specified > > > > Volker, this is totally normal behaviour. Do a su and then xclock and you will > > get the same. > > I know what this means, I simply wanted to point out that the shared-library > error is gone ;) Oh, sorry, I was wearing wrong glasses. Showing an other error message to prove that another error is gone is indeed a nice idea. :-) -- Chris Christoph P. U. Kukulies kukulies (at) rwth-aachen.de