From owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Aug 24 17:09:21 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EAE593CA for ; Sat, 24 Aug 2013 17:09:21 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from andre@freebsd.org) Received: from c00l3r.networx.ch (c00l3r.networx.ch [62.48.2.2]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 59B812930 for ; Sat, 24 Aug 2013 17:09:20 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 93648 invoked from network); 24 Aug 2013 17:51:52 -0000 Received: from c00l3r.networx.ch (HELO [127.0.0.1]) ([62.48.2.2]) (envelope-sender ) by c00l3r.networx.ch (qmail-ldap-1.03) with SMTP for ; 24 Aug 2013 17:51:52 -0000 Message-ID: <5218E8B6.5090407@freebsd.org> Date: Sat, 24 Aug 2013 19:09:10 +0200 From: Andre Oppermann User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130801 Thunderbird/17.0.8 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Adrian Chadd Subject: Re: route/arp lifetime (Re: it's the output, not ack coalescing (Re: TSO and FreeBSD vs Linux)) References: <520A6D07.5080106@freebsd.org> <520B74DD.1060102@ipfw.ru> <20130814124024.GA64548@onelab2.iet.unipi.it> <201308141740.28779.zec@fer.hr> <20130814154853.GA66341@onelab2.iet.unipi.it> <521204A9.7080607@ipfw.ru> <52152837.9010101@freebsd.org> <5218ABB4.5070601@ipfw.ru> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: FreeBSD Net , "Alexander V. Chernikov" X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 24 Aug 2013 17:09:22 -0000 On 24.08.2013 19:04, Adrian Chadd wrote: > I'm very close to starting an mbuf batching thing to use in a few places like receive, transmit and > transmit completion -> free path. I'd be interested in your review/feedback and testing as it sounds > like something you can easily stress test there. :) I'd strongly recommend fixing a number of other places and collect lower hanging fruit before starting with mbuf batching. -- Andre