From owner-freebsd-questions Thu Jan 4 10:00:44 1996 Return-Path: owner-questions Received: (from root@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.3/8.7.3) id KAA20077 for questions-outgoing; Thu, 4 Jan 1996 10:00:44 -0800 (PST) Received: from phaeton.artisoft.com (phaeton.Artisoft.COM [198.17.250.211]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.3/8.7.3) with SMTP id KAA20072 for ; Thu, 4 Jan 1996 10:00:41 -0800 (PST) Received: (from terry@localhost) by phaeton.artisoft.com (8.6.11/8.6.9) id KAA18045; Thu, 4 Jan 1996 10:47:27 -0700 From: Terry Lambert Message-Id: <199601041747.KAA18045@phaeton.artisoft.com> Subject: Re: which vi is used in FreeBSD 2.1 ?? To: leisner@sdsp.mc.xerox.com (Marty Leisner) Date: Thu, 4 Jan 1996 10:47:26 -0700 (MST) Cc: terry@lambert.org, d_burr@ix.netcom.com, web@merit.edu, questions@freebsd.org In-Reply-To: <9601041739.AA13813@gnu.mc.xerox.com> from "Marty Leisner" at Jan 4, 96 09:39:04 am X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4 PL24] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-questions@freebsd.org Precedence: bulk > My understanding is the Bill Joy vi doesn't even catch SIGWINCH... > > Would you prefer a vi (like Sun's) which doesn't resize in an xterm? I think the "SIGnal WINdow CHange" is actually Sun-specific. No, I wouldn't prefer that. But typing "^Z" and "fg\r" shouldn't break my cursor keys on a VT100, the standard by which all other terminals are judged. Terry Lambert terry@lambert.org --- Any opinions in this posting are my own and not those of my present or previous employers.