From owner-freebsd-scsi@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Oct 27 16:58:41 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-scsi@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-scsi@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 83D9C16A403; Fri, 27 Oct 2006 16:58:41 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from scottl@samsco.org) Received: from pooker.samsco.org (pooker.samsco.org [168.103.85.57]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E967543D67; Fri, 27 Oct 2006 16:58:40 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from scottl@samsco.org) Received: from [10.10.3.185] ([165.236.175.187]) (authenticated bits=0) by pooker.samsco.org (8.13.4/8.13.4) with ESMTP id k9RGwY1E011025; Fri, 27 Oct 2006 10:58:39 -0600 (MDT) (envelope-from scottl@samsco.org) Message-ID: <45423AB5.3020503@samsco.org> Date: Fri, 27 Oct 2006 10:58:29 -0600 From: Scott Long User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; FreeBSD i386; en-US; rv:1.7.12) Gecko/20060206 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: mjacob@freebsd.org References: <20061027090957.V60559@ns1.feral.com> In-Reply-To: <20061027090957.V60559@ns1.feral.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.0 required=3.8 tests=none autolearn=failed version=3.1.1 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.1 (2006-03-10) on pooker.samsco.org Cc: freebsd-scsi@freebsd.org Subject: Re: CAM_NEW_TRAN X-BeenThere: freebsd-scsi@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: SCSI subsystem List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 27 Oct 2006 16:58:41 -0000 mjacob@freebsd.org wrote: > > Is there any reason to *not* proceed with CAM_NEW_TRAN and just bite the > bullet now and move ahead? > I have no objection against it. Scott