From owner-freebsd-pf@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jan 23 16:30:14 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-pf@hub.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 43086106568B for ; Mon, 23 Jan 2012 16:30:14 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from gnats@FreeBSD.org) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::28]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 31AE28FC16 for ; Mon, 23 Jan 2012 16:30:14 +0000 (UTC) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id q0NGUEtc083943 for ; Mon, 23 Jan 2012 16:30:14 GMT (envelope-from gnats@freefall.freebsd.org) Received: (from gnats@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.14.5/8.14.5/Submit) id q0NGUER3083940; Mon, 23 Jan 2012 16:30:14 GMT (envelope-from gnats) Date: Mon, 23 Jan 2012 16:30:14 GMT Message-Id: <201201231630.q0NGUER3083940@freefall.freebsd.org> To: freebsd-pf@FreeBSD.org From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Ermal_Lu=E7i?= Cc: Subject: Re: kern/163208: [pf] PF state key linking mismatch X-BeenThere: freebsd-pf@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Ermal_Lu=E7i?= List-Id: "Technical discussion and general questions about packet filter \(pf\)" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 23 Jan 2012 16:30:14 -0000 The following reply was made to PR kern/163208; it has been noted by GNATS. From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Ermal_Lu=E7i?= To: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Tilman_Keskin=F6z?= Cc: bug-followup@freebsd.org Subject: Re: kern/163208: [pf] PF state key linking mismatch Date: Mon, 23 Jan 2012 17:21:21 +0100 On Mon, Jan 23, 2012 at 1:13 PM, Tilman Keskin=F6z wrot= e: > > * Ermal Lu=E7i [Mon, 23 Jan 2012 11:50:07 GMT]: > > > > > =A0Probably a sysctl to disable this should be provided. > > =A0There might be unexpected consequences from this and the better fix = is to > > =A0find the section where the mbuf is being reused. > > What consequences? > > Is there anything that can be done, to debug where the mbuf is reused? > You have to find the subsystem that does the re-use. Starting from the pf state seeing if it is udp/tcp/... then trying finding the specific part that would trigger this. As in TCP after a RST or somesuch. > > > > > > =A0> Please fix :) -- Ermal