From owner-freebsd-java Mon Oct 18 8:28:48 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-java@freebsd.org Received: from ns.mt.sri.com (ns.mt.sri.com [206.127.79.91]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3043815007 for ; Mon, 18 Oct 1999 08:28:45 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from nate@mt.sri.com) Received: from mt.sri.com (rocky.mt.sri.com [206.127.76.100]) by ns.mt.sri.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with SMTP id JAA10297; Mon, 18 Oct 1999 09:28:44 -0600 (MDT) (envelope-from nate@rocky.mt.sri.com) Received: by mt.sri.com (SMI-8.6/SMI-SVR4) id JAA16467; Mon, 18 Oct 1999 09:28:42 -0600 Date: Mon, 18 Oct 1999 09:28:42 -0600 Message-Id: <199910181528.JAA16467@mt.sri.com> From: Nate Williams MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: Mikhail Kruk Cc: java@FreeBSD.ORG In-Reply-To: References: X-Mailer: VM 6.34 under 19.16 "Lille" XEmacs Lucid Reply-To: nate@mt.sri.com (Nate Williams) Sender: owner-freebsd-java@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org > So Linux emulation gives better performance than netive port? WOuld 1.1.8 > do better than that? Yes, but not better than the Linux port. The reason the linux port does better has *nothing* to do with emulation, but because the linux port has a good JIT, and the native port does not. > off-topic: Would using Linux Netscape show the same order of performance > boost? Right now this applet take 30 (!) seconds under FreeBSD Netscape. > Compare to 1.5 seconds with Windows Netscape and 10 seconds on RedHat... Nope, because the JIT is part of the JDK, not part of netscape. Linux netscape has no JIT, although the Windows version does. Nate To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-java" in the body of the message