From owner-freebsd-hackers  Wed Feb 19 22:58:04 1997
Return-Path: <owner-hackers>
Received: (from root@localhost)
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) id WAA22796
          for hackers-outgoing; Wed, 19 Feb 1997 22:58:04 -0800 (PST)
Received: from bunyip.cc.uq.edu.au (daemon@bunyip.cc.uq.edu.au [130.102.2.1])
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id WAA22782
          for <freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org>; Wed, 19 Feb 1997 22:58:00 -0800 (PST)
Received: (from daemon@localhost)
	by bunyip.cc.uq.edu.au (8.8.5/8.8.5) id QAA19804;
	Thu, 20 Feb 1997 16:57:49 +1000
Received: by ogre.devetir.qld.gov.au (8.7.5/DEVETIR-E0.3a)
	id QAA07183; Thu, 20 Feb 1997 16:43:01 +1000 (EST)
Date: Thu, 20 Feb 1997 16:43:01 +1000 (EST)
From: Stephen McKay <syssgm@devetir.qld.gov.au>
Message-Id: <199702200643.QAA07183@ogre.devetir.qld.gov.au>
To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org
cc: syssgm@devetir.qld.gov.au, j@uriah.heep.sax.de
Subject: Re: ports/2756: top causes segmentation fault
X-Newsreader: NN version 6.5.0 #1 (NOV)
Sender: owner-hackers@freebsd.org
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org
Precedence: bulk

Joe Greco <jgreco@solaria.sol.net> wrote:

>> As Wolfram Schneider wrote:
>> 
>> > Yes, we should import top(1) into the base system (src/contrib/top).
>> > The top sources are only 120KB. 
>> 
>> Are there any contradictionary opinions?
>
>I think it would be a functional addition and would not object, although it
>is bloat in the general sense.

Everyone loves top!  I certainly use it far more than I use tcl and perl
and both of them are in the base system.  They seem to be a bit bigger than
top, too. :-)

Stephen.