From owner-freebsd-mobile Wed Apr 21 1:13:32 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-mobile@freebsd.org Received: from rover.village.org (rover.village.org [204.144.255.49]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B671714C1E for ; Wed, 21 Apr 1999 01:13:30 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from imp@harmony.village.org) Received: from harmony.village.org (harmony.village.org [10.0.0.6]) by rover.village.org (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id CAA65471 for ; Wed, 21 Apr 1999 02:10:43 -0600 (MDT) (envelope-from imp@harmony.village.org) Received: from harmony.village.org (localhost.village.org [127.0.0.1]) by harmony.village.org (8.9.3/8.8.3) with ESMTP id CAA09129 for ; Wed, 21 Apr 1999 02:10:44 -0600 (MDT) Message-Id: <199904210810.CAA09129@harmony.village.org> Subject: APM and newbus To: mobile@FreeBSD.ORG Date: Wed, 21 Apr 1999 02:10:44 -0600 From: Warner Losh Sender: owner-freebsd-mobile@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org I just corrected a bug in the newbus version of apm which had prevented me from suspending my Vaio 505-TS. In newbus there is a DEVICE_SUSPEND method which gets called and allows the callee to request a veto of the proposed suspend. It was alway returning veto, so suspend never worked. Now that I fixed this, my Vaio suspends nicely. I've kludged around this in the apm code until I can find the bug in the newbus code. Just wanted to let people know that this was the case. Warner To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-mobile" in the body of the message