From owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Sep 15 20:52:48 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 01BCA16A407 for ; Fri, 15 Sep 2006 20:52:48 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from lab@gta.com) Received: from gta.com (gta-edge-199-20.gta.com [199.120.225.20]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 6851943D55 for ; Fri, 15 Sep 2006 20:52:47 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from lab@gta.com) Received: (qmail 95154 invoked by uid 1000); 15 Sep 2006 20:52:46 -0000 Date: Fri, 15 Sep 2006 16:52:46 -0400 From: Larry Baird To: Scott Ullrich Message-ID: <20060915165246.A92818@gta.com> References: <20060914093034.A83805@gta.com> <20060915091430.A45488@gta.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i In-Reply-To: ; from sullrich@gmail.com on Fri, Sep 15, 2006 at 12:07:58PM -0400 Cc: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Subject: Re: FAST_IPSEC NAT-T support X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 15 Sep 2006 20:52:48 -0000 On Fri, Sep 15, 2006 at 12:07:58PM -0400, Scott Ullrich wrote: > On 9/15/06, Larry Baird wrote: > > On Thu, Sep 14, 2006 at 09:43:38PM -0400, Scott Ullrich wrote: > > > On 9/14/06, Larry Baird wrote: > > > > Please find attached two patches for adding FAST_IPSEC NAT-T support to > > > > FreeBSD 6.x. The patch "freebsd6-fastipsec-natt.diff" is dependent > > > > upon Yvan's IPSEC NAT-T patch "freebsd6-natt.diff" which can be found at > > > > http://ipsec-tools.cvs.sourceforge.net/ipsec-tools/htdocs/. The second > > > > patch "freebsd6-ipsec-fastipsec-natt.diff" is a cumulative patch > > > > combining both patches together. > > Great, thanks! > > Next problem that I have encountered (with FAST_IPSEC) is: > > # /sbin/setkey -D > Invalid extension type > Invalid extension type > Invalid extension type > Invalid extension type > Invalid extension type > Invalid extension type > Invalid extension type > Invalid extension type > Invalid extension type > Invalid extension type > Invalid extension type > Invalid extension type > Invalid extension type > Invalid extension type > > Let me know if I can do any further testing, still waiting for status > reports from a few of the pfSense users, but IPSEC seems to work okay > even with this small cosmetic setkey issue. Just to be sure I understand the issue. You have a kernel built with the FAST_IPSEC NAT-T patches but without the IPSEC_NAT_T option. Your VPNs work but you are unable to dump your SAD entries. Larry -- ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Larry Baird | http://www.gta.com Global Technology Associates, Inc. | Orlando, FL Email: lab@gta.com | TEL 407-380-0220, FAX 407-380-6080