From owner-freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Mar 12 19:50:01 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports-bugs@smarthost.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id EC5FAEEE for ; Wed, 12 Mar 2014 19:50:01 +0000 (UTC) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206c::16:87]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D9785958 for ; Wed, 12 Mar 2014 19:50:01 +0000 (UTC) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.14.8/8.14.8) with ESMTP id s2CJo1oW066605 for ; Wed, 12 Mar 2014 19:50:01 GMT (envelope-from gnats@freefall.freebsd.org) Received: (from gnats@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.14.8/8.14.8/Submit) id s2CJo1nB066604; Wed, 12 Mar 2014 19:50:01 GMT (envelope-from gnats) Date: Wed, 12 Mar 2014 19:50:01 GMT Message-Id: <201403121950.s2CJo1nB066604@freefall.freebsd.org> To: freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org Cc: From: Adam McDougall Subject: Re: ports/187490: Update by MAINTAINER for Portscout (for mail/vacation) X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports-bugs@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17 Precedence: list Reply-To: Adam McDougall List-Id: Ports bug reports List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 12 Mar 2014 19:50:02 -0000 The following reply was made to PR ports/187490; it has been noted by GNATS. From: Adam McDougall To: bug-followup@FreeBSD.org Cc: Subject: Re: ports/187490: Update by MAINTAINER for Portscout (for mail/vacation) Date: Wed, 12 Mar 2014 15:40:00 -0400 I left out a couple things by accident. 1. This is for the mail/vacation port 2. The current distfile is not fetchable on many mirrors; I suggest modifying DISTNAME as so: DISTNAME= ${PORTNAME}_${PORTVERSION}-0.4 I see no reason to cause a rebuild by modifying PORTVERSION since from the FreeBSD perspective, it is just a tarball re-roll. On the other hand it is very small. I verified the differences were only debian metadata between the two. It will require a new distinfo: SHA256 (vacation_3.3.0-0.4.tar.gz) = 086a3dfde953aa5247a5389fa17f1f77312acd54e3cc74a0369eb363c798b567 SIZE (vacation_3.3.0-0.4.tar.gz) = 11473