From owner-freebsd-doc@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Apr 24 07:00:40 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-doc@hub.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4745716A4CE for ; Sun, 24 Apr 2005 07:00:40 +0000 (GMT) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.freebsd.org [216.136.204.21]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2278D43D53 for ; Sun, 24 Apr 2005 07:00:40 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from gnats@FreeBSD.org) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (gnats@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.13.3/8.13.3) with ESMTP id j3O70dCj005274 for ; Sun, 24 Apr 2005 07:00:39 GMT (envelope-from gnats@freefall.freebsd.org) Received: (from gnats@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.13.3/8.13.1/Submit) id j3O70dtX005273; Sun, 24 Apr 2005 07:00:39 GMT (envelope-from gnats) Date: Sun, 24 Apr 2005 07:00:39 GMT Message-Id: <200504240700.j3O70dtX005273@freefall.freebsd.org> To: freebsd-doc@FreeBSD.org From: "Wojciech A. Koszek" Subject: Re: docs/80290: [PATCH] "nonfs" instead of "nfs" in mount.8 X-BeenThere: freebsd-doc@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: "Wojciech A. Koszek" List-Id: Documentation project List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 24 Apr 2005 07:00:40 -0000 The following reply was made to PR docs/80290; it has been noted by GNATS. From: "Wojciech A. Koszek" To: bug-followup@FreeBSD.org Cc: Subject: Re: docs/80290: [PATCH] "nonfs" instead of "nfs" in mount.8 Date: Sun, 24 Apr 2005 07:09:07 +0000 On Sun, Apr 24, 2005 at 02:57:27AM +0000, Jesus R. Camou wrote: > Synopsis: [PATCH] "nonfs" instead of "nfs" in mount.8 > > State-Changed-From-To: open->closed > State-Changed-By: jcamou > State-Changed-When: Sun Apr 24 02:55:58 GMT 2005 > State-Changed-Why: > This is not a typo, nonfs is the intended word. > > http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=80290 Hello, I was thinking about this mistake, and it seems I've posted wrong patch. I mean I know "nonfs" is correct, but we should have also "nonullfs", since neither NFS nor NULLFS has to be mounted. Sorry and thanks! Best regards, -- * Wojciech A. Koszek && dunstan@FreeBSD.czest.pl --- diff.1.mount.8 begins here --- Index: src/sbin/mount/mount.8 =================================================================== RCS file: /home/ncvs/src/sbin/mount/mount.8,v retrieving revision 1.72 diff -r1.72 mount.8 372c372 < mount -a -t nonfs,nullfs --- > mount -a -t nonfs,nonullfs --- diff.1.mount.8 ends here ---