From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG  Mon Sep 29 03:12:53 2014
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
Received: from hub.FreeBSD.org (hub.freebsd.org
 [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206c::16:88])
 (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits))
 (No client certificate requested)
 by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7F038D34;
 Mon, 29 Sep 2014 03:12:52 +0000 (UTC)
Date: Sun, 28 Sep 2014 23:12:49 -0400
From: Glen Barber <gjb@FreeBSD.org>
To: beeessdee@ruggedinbox.com
Subject: Re: FreeBSD 10.1-BETA3 Now Available
Message-ID: <20140929031249.GJ75063@hub.FreeBSD.org>
References: <20140928155118.GA75063@hub.FreeBSD.org>
 <fe17030e3efeefb5dfa800b46ee181d9.squirrel@s4bysmmsnraf7eut.onion>
 <20140929025102.GH75063@hub.FreeBSD.org>
 <d857447441d76080fc3f1b480e5d46fb.squirrel@s4bysmmsnraf7eut.onion>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256;
 protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="XsNr6wQGW5mnDcoi"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <d857447441d76080fc3f1b480e5d46fb.squirrel@s4bysmmsnraf7eut.onion>
X-Operating-System: FreeBSD 11.0-CURRENT amd64
X-SCUD-Definition: Sudden Completely Unexpected Dataloss
X-SULE-Definition: Sudden Unexpected Learning Event
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12)
Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org,
 FreeBSD Release Engineering Team <re@freebsd.org>
X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1
Precedence: list
List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code <freebsd-stable.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/options/freebsd-stable>,
 <mailto:freebsd-stable-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-stable/>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-stable-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable>,
 <mailto:freebsd-stable-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 29 Sep 2014 03:12:53 -0000


--XsNr6wQGW5mnDcoi
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Mon, Sep 29, 2014 at 04:58:38AM +0200, beeessdee@ruggedinbox.com wrote:
> On Mon, September 29, 2014 4:51 am, "Glen Barber" <gjb@FreeBSD.org> wrote:
> > On Mon, Sep 29, 2014 at 04:45:21AM +0200, beeessdee@ruggedinbox.com wro=
te:
> >> Why 10.1-BETA3 announcement signed with not usual PGP key?
> >>
> >
> > Because it is a BETA build, and not a release.
> >
>=20
> As my first mail said:  BETA2 announce signed with keyid 0xAF8B5ED0
> (subkey of primary 0xA0B946A3, Key fingerprint =3D 78B3 42BA 26C7 B2AC 68=
1E=20
> A7BE 524F 0C37 A0B9 46A3).  So as BETA1, and many other prerelease
> announce by you IIRC...
>=20
> So, why BETA2 and BETA3 different keys?  Is there official policy?
>=20

No.  See subsequent reply.

Glen


--XsNr6wQGW5mnDcoi
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2
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=/NOi
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--XsNr6wQGW5mnDcoi--