From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Nov 24 18:07:58 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0D9C016A4CE for ; Mon, 24 Nov 2003 18:07:58 -0800 (PST) Received: from gw.catspoiler.org (217-ip-163.nccn.net [209.79.217.163]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 241C643FF3 for ; Mon, 24 Nov 2003 18:07:57 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from truckman@FreeBSD.org) Received: from FreeBSD.org (mousie.catspoiler.org [192.168.101.2]) by gw.catspoiler.org (8.12.9p2/8.12.9) with ESMTP id hAP27MeF009247; Mon, 24 Nov 2003 18:07:26 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from truckman@FreeBSD.org) Message-Id: <200311250207.hAP27MeF009247@gw.catspoiler.org> Date: Mon, 24 Nov 2003 18:07:22 -0800 (PST) From: Don Lewis To: doconnor@gsoft.com.au In-Reply-To: <200311251214.23290.doconnor@gsoft.com.au> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/plain; charset=us-ascii cc: freebsd-current@FreeBSD.org cc: dnelson@allantgroup.com cc: gallatin@cs.duke.edu Subject: Re: 40% slowdown with dynamic /bin/sh X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 25 Nov 2003 02:07:58 -0000 On 25 Nov, Daniel O'Connor wrote: > On Tuesday 25 November 2003 11:52, Dan Nelson wrote: > > > I'd greatly prefer that the the dynamic root default be backed out >> > > until a substantial amount of this performance can be recovered. >> > >> > What _REAL WORLD_ task does this slow down? >> >> Try timing "cd /usr/ports/www/mozilla-devel ; make clean" with static >> and dynamic /bin. bsd.port.mk spawns many many many /bin/sh processes. > > OK my bad, it will probably slow down the ports building. The ports infrastructure is horribly slow even with a static sh, though not as glacially slow as installing and patching Solaris 9.