From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG  Sun Jul 18 01:07:20 2004
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0D64116A4CE
	for <current@freebsd.org>; Sun, 18 Jul 2004 01:07:20 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from mail.sandvine.com (sandvine.com [199.243.201.138])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 64F0243D31
	for <current@freebsd.org>; Sun, 18 Jul 2004 01:07:19 +0000 (GMT)
	(envelope-from don@sandvine.com)
Received: by mail.sandvine.com with Internet Mail Service (5.5.2657.72)
	id <PAC3QTR1>; Sat, 17 Jul 2004 21:07:18 -0400
Message-ID: <FE045D4D9F7AED4CBFF1B3B813C85337051D936E@mail.sandvine.com>
From: Don Bowman <don@sandvine.com>
To: 'Matthew Dillon' <dillon@apollo.backplane.com>
Date: Sat, 17 Jul 2004 21:07:17 -0400
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2657.72)
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset="iso-8859-1"
cc: current@freebsd.org
Subject: RE: panic: APIC: Previous IPI is stuck
X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current
	<freebsd-current.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current>,
	<mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-current>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-current@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current>,
	<mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 18 Jul 2004 01:07:20 -0000

From: Matthew Dillon [mailto:dillon@apollo.backplane.com]
>     [ tick tock tick tock tick tock... You are getting 
> sleepy... sleepy!
>     You are becoming receptive.  You will port DragonFly's 
> IPI messaging
>     subsystem.  At the snap of my fingers you will wake up 
> ....  1  ....
>     2  .....  3 .... SNAP! ].
> 
> 						-Matt

:)

Although you meant this as a bit of a joke (and
it is kind of funny...) what would be involved 
in this port?

Have you done any benchmarks to see how well
this performs?

--don