From owner-freebsd-hackers Sun Dec 3 14:12:41 1995 Return-Path: owner-hackers Received: (from root@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.6.12/8.6.6) id OAA28062 for hackers-outgoing; Sun, 3 Dec 1995 14:12:41 -0800 Received: from expo.x.org (expo.x.org [198.112.45.11]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.6.12/8.6.6) with ESMTP id OAA28052 for ; Sun, 3 Dec 1995 14:12:31 -0800 Received: from exalt.x.org by expo.x.org id AA22038; Sun, 3 Dec 95 17:11:59 -0500 Received: from localhost by exalt.x.org id WAA17372; Sun, 3 Dec 1995 22:11:59 GMT Message-Id: <199512032211.WAA17372@exalt.x.org> To: hackers@freefall.FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: Minor change to make In-Reply-To: Your message of Sun, 03 Dec 1995 11:51:48 EDT. <199512031651.LAA13301@spooky.rwwa.com> Organization: X Consortium Date: Sun, 03 Dec 1995 17:11:58 EDT From: "Kaleb S. KEITHLEY" Sender: owner-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk > > I know hacking make isn't as sexy as writing file systems, schedulers, > > MS-DOS emulators, and linux binary compat; but I don't understand the > > resistance to adding this? > > So, you're saying that this resistance is evidence of some sort > of moral failing? I really really really wasn't going to say any more on this topic. I'm not sure how you get to "moral failing." Seems more like a priorities issue. I think some of the responses to this simple enhancement request could have been written by Gary Kildall. ;-) -- Kaleb KEITHLEY