From owner-freebsd-bugs Thu Jul 19 10:30: 5 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-bugs@hub.freebsd.org Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.freebsd.org [216.136.204.21]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A422537B405 for ; Thu, 19 Jul 2001 10:30:01 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from gnats@FreeBSD.org) Received: (from gnats@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.11.4/8.11.4) id f6JHU1855430; Thu, 19 Jul 2001 10:30:01 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from gnats) Date: Thu, 19 Jul 2001 10:30:01 -0700 (PDT) Message-Id: <200107191730.f6JHU1855430@freefall.freebsd.org> To: freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.org Cc: From: Will Andrews Subject: Re: bin/28988: We need more simple message digesting tools Reply-To: Will Andrews Sender: owner-freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.org The following reply was made to PR bin/28988; it has been noted by GNATS. From: Will Andrews To: Dima Dorfman Cc: FreeBSD GNATS DB Subject: Re: bin/28988: We need more simple message digesting tools Date: Thu, 19 Jul 2001 12:28:10 -0500 On Mon, Jul 16, 2001 at 10:30:01PM -0700, Dima Dorfman (dima@unixfreak.org) wrote: > Why? What's wrong with: > > ln -s /usr/bin/openssl md5 > > works for sha, sha1, ripemd160, and a few other algorithms. The only > thing wrong with it is that openssl doesn't support some of the > options md5(1) does, and has a slightly different output format. The output thing is not a problem -- one can always pipe to sed(1) to solve it. -- wca To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-bugs" in the body of the message