From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG  Wed Jan 29 14:26:02 2014
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115])
 (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
 (No client certificate requested)
 by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BFBCD6AA
 for <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>; Wed, 29 Jan 2014 14:26:02 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from mail.bsdbox.co (122-149-22-79.static.dsl.dodo.com.au
 [122.149.22.79])
 (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-CAMELLIA256-SHA (256/256 bits))
 (No client certificate requested)
 by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7636E1EB2
 for <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>; Wed, 29 Jan 2014 14:26:02 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from [10.0.0.4] (122-149-22-79.static.dsl.dodo.com.au
 [122.149.22.79])
 (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-CAMELLIA256-SHA (256/256 bits))
 (No client certificate requested)
 by mail.bsdbox.co (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 38A5923874C
 for <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>; Wed, 29 Jan 2014 14:25:54 +0000 (UTC)
Message-ID: <52E90F70.6070000@bsdbox.co>
Date: Thu, 30 Jan 2014 01:25:52 +1100
From: nano <nanotek@bsdbox.co>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64;
 rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.2.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: weird error messages with various ports
References: <20140127120519.Horde.zk6gGzrJZ8n-kUHavzPiTw1@webmail.df.eu>
 <20140127191858.78a3fa5d@X220.alogt.com>
 <20140127114919.GA66024@elfsechsundzwanzig.de>
 <20140127200326.026e6c35@X220.alogt.com>
 <20140127121011.GA68344@elfsechsundzwanzig.de>
 <20140127203002.37fbb036@X220.alogt.com>
 <Pine.NEB.4.64.1401291401090.12416@faeroes.freeshell.org>
In-Reply-To: <Pine.NEB.4.64.1401291401090.12416@faeroes.freeshell.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: User questions <freebsd-questions.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/options/freebsd-questions>, 
 <mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-questions/>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions>, 
 <mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 29 Jan 2014 14:26:02 -0000

On 30/01/2014 1:06 AM, Charlie wrote:
>
> The second advantage being that if you have several machines to
> maintain, you no longer have to wait for each one to build ports. Just
> build once using poudriere, fire up a web server to host the package
> repo, and point all the machines at that repo. Build once, install many!
>
> Charlie
>

Assuming all systems are the same architecture and require the same 
build options. Sure, Poudriere on amd64 can build for i386 too, but 
that's not necessarily any more efficient in some scenarios.

Would be much nicer if port trees were broken less often.

-- 
bsdbox.co