From owner-freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.ORG  Wed Nov 28 12:40:08 2012
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-ports-bugs@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52])
 by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1BB4534F
 for <freebsd-ports-bugs@freebsd.org>; Wed, 28 Nov 2012 12:40:08 +0000 (UTC)
 (envelope-from wxs@atarininja.org)
Received: from syn.atarininja.org (syn.csh.rit.edu [129.21.49.45])
 by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E51588FC1C
 for <freebsd-ports-bugs@freebsd.org>; Wed, 28 Nov 2012 12:40:07 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by syn.atarininja.org (Postfix, from userid 1001)
 id 895205C3C; Wed, 28 Nov 2012 07:40:06 -0500 (EST)
Date: Wed, 28 Nov 2012 07:40:06 -0500
From: Wesley Shields <wxs@FreeBSD.org>
To: Phillip Neumann <pneumann@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: ports/173957: [PATCH]: net/rabbitmq - Update to 3.0.0
Message-ID: <20121128124006.GA38129@atarininja.org>
References: <201211271914.qARJEd5K081240@freefall.freebsd.org>
 <CAHoZ-AwxG90ePTew3R1CZqUt6kZCL8JwRyO7QDqZFu7aGdxTXQ@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <CAHoZ-AwxG90ePTew3R1CZqUt6kZCL8JwRyO7QDqZFu7aGdxTXQ@mail.gmail.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15)
Cc: freebsd-ports-bugs@freebsd.org
X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports-bugs@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14
Precedence: list
List-Id: Ports bug reports <freebsd-ports-bugs.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/options/freebsd-ports-bugs>, 
 <mailto:freebsd-ports-bugs-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-ports-bugs>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-ports-bugs@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-ports-bugs-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports-bugs>, 
 <mailto:freebsd-ports-bugs-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 28 Nov 2012 12:40:08 -0000

On Wed, Nov 28, 2012 at 09:07:23AM -0300, Phillip Neumann wrote:
> Greate??

Unfortunately I'm not sure what you're trying to say here. :(

If you approve of the patch please let me know or let me know how I can
improve it or help you improve it. Thanks!

-- WXS