From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Apr 29 21:19:49 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6887D106564A for ; Thu, 29 Apr 2010 21:19:49 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from avg@icyb.net.ua) Received: from citadel.icyb.net.ua (citadel.icyb.net.ua [212.40.38.140]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AB1F88FC0A for ; Thu, 29 Apr 2010 21:19:48 +0000 (UTC) Received: from porto.topspin.kiev.ua (porto-e.starpoint.kiev.ua [212.40.38.100]) by citadel.icyb.net.ua (8.8.8p3/ICyb-2.3exp) with ESMTP id AAA18333; Fri, 30 Apr 2010 00:19:45 +0300 (EEST) (envelope-from avg@icyb.net.ua) Received: from localhost.topspin.kiev.ua ([127.0.0.1]) by porto.topspin.kiev.ua with esmtp (Exim 4.34 (FreeBSD)) id 1O7b97-0009jt-Me; Fri, 30 Apr 2010 00:19:45 +0300 Message-ID: <4BD9F7F1.7020607@icyb.net.ua> Date: Fri, 30 Apr 2010 00:19:45 +0300 From: Andriy Gapon User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.24 (X11/20100321) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Michael Moll References: <20100429153154.GA70173@darkthrone.kvedulv.de> <4BD9ED1A.3050100@icyb.net.ua> <20100429211256.GA73377@darkthrone.kvedulv.de> In-Reply-To: <20100429211256.GA73377@darkthrone.kvedulv.de> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.96.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: config(8) dumps core X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 29 Apr 2010 21:19:49 -0000 on 30/04/2010 00:12 Michael Moll said the following: > Hi, > > On Thu, Apr 29, 2010 at 11:33:30PM +0300, Andriy Gapon wrote: >> on 29/04/2010 18:31 Michael Moll said the following: >> You can use hd to see if you indeed have '\0' (0x00) symbol somewhere within >> your kernel config file. > > Thanks, I checked this and there are no 0x00s in the config file itself, Then that assert message is strange. Or there is something else to this situation. > but a hd to /boot/kernel/kernel reveals: > > 09 66 77 69 70 0a 64 65 76 69 63 65 09 64 63 6f |.fwip.device.dco| > 6e 73 0a 64 65 76 69 63 65 09 64 63 6f 6e 73 5f |ns.device.dcons_| > 63 72 6f 6d 0a 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 |crom............| > 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 |................| > > This also explains why a recent config-binary worked against the old > kernel... The were some commits to /src/usr.sbin/config/* in the last > weeks, maybe one of them broke this. Actually I think that this doesn't mean anything. /boot/kernel/kernel is a binary, an executable, it is expected to have a fair amount of 0x00 in it. That assert was specifically about kernel _config_ file. -- Andriy Gapon