From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jul 26 06:14:44 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 49C7F16A41F for ; Tue, 26 Jul 2005 06:14:44 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from igorr@speechpro.com) Received: from speechpro.com (speech-tech-2.ip.PeterStar.net [81.3.190.130]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C244343D53 for ; Tue, 26 Jul 2005 06:14:43 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from igorr@speechpro.com) Received: from sysadm.stc ([192.168.2.26]) by s1.stc with esmtp (Exim 4.44 (FreeBSD)) id 1DxIhT-0005rK-6T for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Tue, 26 Jul 2005 10:13:59 +0400 Message-ID: <42E5D4BA.5090801@speechpro.com> Date: Tue, 26 Jul 2005 10:14:18 +0400 From: Igor Robul User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.2 (X11/20050518) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <200507231237.44829.bulk_mail@siegel-tech.net> <42E2DCAC.3060700@grokking.org> In-Reply-To: <42E2DCAC.3060700@grokking.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Archived: Yes Subject: Re: [OT Re: SPAM Problem] X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 26 Jul 2005 06:14:44 -0000 Greg Maruszeczka wrote: >It's probably "blowback" resulting from the activities of worm-infected >windows hosts. Someone you correspond with got infected and the worm >subsequently propagated itself by picking your name from their address >book and inserting it into the from: header of the message carrying the >worm. Then, badly configured MTAs send "helpful" NDRs to the "sender" >informing them that they're messages couldn't be delivered > >Pretty routine, really. > > In 2005.01 we have got 48605 bounce messages (instead of 4-10, our clients prefer to call phone) to our help desk email and I was _forced_ to close this address with semi-helpful message after "RCPT TO:" command about new address. Now I reopened address and we get "normal" number of spam messages at it.