From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Sep 30 14:38:18 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C9D58106568D for ; Wed, 30 Sep 2009 14:38:18 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ale@FreeBSD.org) Received: from andxor.it (relay.andxor.it [195.223.2.3]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 1A7778FC1A for ; Wed, 30 Sep 2009 14:38:17 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 5627 invoked from network); 30 Sep 2009 14:11:37 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO ale.andxor.it) (192.168.2.5) by andxor.it with SMTP; 30 Sep 2009 14:11:37 -0000 Message-ID: <4AC36719.3010607@FreeBSD.org> Date: Wed, 30 Sep 2009 16:11:37 +0200 From: Alex Dupre User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.22 (X11/20090624) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Alexander Leidinger References: <20090930135327.83446wivezjxxlc8@webmail.leidinger.net> In-Reply-To: <20090930135327.83446wivezjxxlc8@webmail.leidinger.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: ifconfig_IF_aliasX regression X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 30 Sep 2009 14:38:18 -0000 Alexander Leidinger ha scritto: > I know the setup should have been the second one from the beginning (at > least the manpage gives something like this as an example), but the > first one worked without problems. The problem is either that it > (silently?) fails, or that it is not documented in UPDATING. Anyone with > their hands there recently with an opinion about it? The change is recent, to unificate ipv4 and ipv6 rc code. We have ipv4_addrs_IF that uses the former syntax, but why not ipv6_addrs_IF, too? -- Alex Dupre