From owner-freebsd-gnome Sat Mar 15 4:17:28 2003 Delivered-To: freebsd-gnome@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 29D3837B401; Sat, 15 Mar 2003 04:17:27 -0800 (PST) Received: from obsecurity.dyndns.org (adsl-63-207-60-150.dsl.lsan03.pacbell.net [63.207.60.150]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 57F0943F85; Sat, 15 Mar 2003 04:17:26 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from kris@obsecurity.org) Received: from rot13.obsecurity.org (rot13.obsecurity.org [10.0.0.5]) by obsecurity.dyndns.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0C2E066B37; Sat, 15 Mar 2003 04:17:26 -0800 (PST) Received: by rot13.obsecurity.org (Postfix, from userid 1000) id BC624FCD; Sat, 15 Mar 2003 04:17:25 -0800 (PST) Date: Sat, 15 Mar 2003 04:17:25 -0800 From: Kris Kennaway To: Joe Marcus Clarke Cc: Kris Kennaway , Murray Stokely , portmgr@FreeBSD.ORG, FreeBSD GNOME Users , re@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: GNOME 2.2 or GNOME 1.4 on 4.8 CDs? Message-ID: <20030315121725.GA10035@rot13.obsecurity.org> References: <20030302190211.Z57064@freebsdmall.com> <1047146177.96334.4.camel@shumai.marcuscom.com> <20030308212650.GD56020@rot13.obsecurity.org> <1047165939.328.58.camel@shumai.marcuscom.com> <20030309002936.GA63061@rot13.obsecurity.org> <1047182292.328.92.camel@shumai.marcuscom.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="fUYQa+Pmc3FrFX/N" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1047182292.328.92.camel@shumai.marcuscom.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4i Sender: owner-freebsd-gnome@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG --fUYQa+Pmc3FrFX/N Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Sat, Mar 08, 2003 at 10:58:12PM -0500, Joe Marcus Clarke wrote: > On Sat, 2003-03-08 at 19:29, Kris Kennaway wrote: > > On Sat, Mar 08, 2003 at 06:25:39PM -0500, Joe Marcus Clarke wrote: > >=20 > > > Okay, I played at this, and found that it will only happen when symli= nks > > > are involved. > >=20 > > Hmm. That's very strange. Do you have any insight into why this is > > happening? >=20 > Here's a simpler patch, but I'm not sure it's the best idea. It > replaces .CURDIR with PWD since .CURDIR will always resolve symlinks. This doesn't seem to be helping :-( Kris --fUYQa+Pmc3FrFX/N Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.1 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQE+cxnVWry0BWjoQKURAvxVAJ9De73chqkOOwVny3rLTrMKJq978QCfWt7+ xHa/J0VmyXigz/YVwn5CE7c= =YF45 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --fUYQa+Pmc3FrFX/N-- To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-gnome" in the body of the message