From owner-freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Sep 5 00:50:34 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-ports-bugs@hub.freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-ports-bugs@hub.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2D3D816A4E5 for ; Tue, 5 Sep 2006 00:50:34 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from gnats@FreeBSD.org) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.freebsd.org [216.136.204.21]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AB02D43D5E for ; Tue, 5 Sep 2006 00:50:28 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from gnats@FreeBSD.org) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (gnats@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.13.4/8.13.4) with ESMTP id k850oSmC076136 for ; Tue, 5 Sep 2006 00:50:28 GMT (envelope-from gnats@freefall.freebsd.org) Received: (from gnats@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.13.4/8.13.4/Submit) id k850oSdS076135; Tue, 5 Sep 2006 00:50:28 GMT (envelope-from gnats) Date: Tue, 5 Sep 2006 00:50:28 GMT Message-Id: <200609050050.k850oSdS076135@freefall.freebsd.org> To: freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org From: Jonathan Hanna Cc: Subject: Re: ports/102738: devel/spin xspin cannot run X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports-bugs@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: Jonathan Hanna List-Id: Ports bug reports List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 05 Sep 2006 00:50:34 -0000 The following reply was made to PR ports/102738; it has been noted by GNATS. From: Jonathan Hanna To: bug-followup@freebsd.org Cc: Subject: Re: ports/102738: devel/spin xspin cannot run Date: Mon, 04 Sep 2006 17:46:33 -0700 (PDT) On 01-Sep-2006 Edwin Groothuis wrote: > Maintainer of devel/spin, > > Please note that PR ports/102738 has just been submitted. > > If it contains a patch for an upgrade, an enhancement or a bug fix > you agree on, reply to this email stating that you approve the patch > and a committer will take care of it. > > The full text of the PR can be found at: > http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=ports/102738 > > -- > Edwin Groothuis > edwin@FreeBSD.org Looks good. I am not sure of the best way to handle this. xspin does not need wish8.4 in particular, and since since wish is not needed to build I would not want to put it in BUILD_DEPENDS. Can a match be done in RUN_DEPENDS and the result picked up for the post-patch? Hmmm. Jonathan Hanna