From owner-freebsd-questions Mon Oct 11 18:41:19 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from typhoon.mail.pipex.net (typhoon.mail.pipex.net [158.43.128.27]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 27BE214C4E for ; Mon, 11 Oct 1999 18:41:15 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from mark@dogma.freebsd-uk.eu.org) Received: (qmail 13496 invoked from network); 12 Oct 1999 01:41:13 -0000 Received: from useraj01.uk.uudial.com (HELO marder-1.) (62.188.133.130) by smtp.dial.pipex.com with SMTP; 12 Oct 1999 01:41:13 -0000 Received: (from mark@localhost) by marder-1. (8.9.3/8.8.8) id CAA00605; Tue, 12 Oct 1999 02:40:56 +0100 (BST) (envelope-from mark) Date: Tue, 12 Oct 1999 02:40:55 +0100 From: Mark Ovens To: Rob Hurle Cc: Marcel Moolenaar , questions@freebsd.org, "Wills, Ken" Subject: Re: Netscape 4.61 (Linux) broken since adding linux_base-5.2 Message-ID: <19991012024055.C317@marder-1> References: <19991011232409.B3243@marder-1> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Mailer: Mutt 1.0pre2i In-Reply-To: Organization: Total lack of Sender: owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Tue, Oct 12, 1999 at 10:59:39AM +1000, Rob Hurle wrote: > Mark Ovens wrote: > > > > Arrgh! I've just had a bad thought. Did I really need to install > > linux_base at all? My system was originally built clean (i.e. not > >... > > Did I need to install linux_base to make Star Office work? I only > > installed it because I was following the instructions at > > http://www.serv.net/~mcglk/staroffice-install.html that someone > > posted. > > > > Is linux_base only meant for systems which don't already have Linux > > support installed and therefore I've just trashed a perfectly good > > working system? After, Star Office is just another Linux program. > > No, I installed linux_base on a 3.3-RELEASE system which was upgraded from > 2.2.8. I needed to put directory names into /compat/linux/etc/ld.so.conf > and run /compat/linux/sbin/ldconfig (which appears to simply update the > file /compat/linux/etc/ld.so.cache) when installing StarOffice. Packages > such as StarOffice now seem to come with their own lib directories in > their own tree. Maybe the vanilla Linux install puts the directories into > the ld.so.conf file and runs ldconfig? Anyway, I did this for StarOffice. > Is is it possible that the version of Netscape that you are using has the > same scheme - that is, its own lib directory which must be installed in > this way? > I've just tried adding /usr/lib (all the other appropriate directories are already there) to /compat/linux/etc/ld.so.conf and running /compat/linux/sbin/ldconfig. Netscape and WP both still seg fault. > Rob Hurle > ---------------------------------------------------------- > Rob Hurle rob@coombs.anu.edu.au > Connect-A Tel: +61 2 6247 2397 > PO Box 13 Fax: +61 2 6248 8905 > Ainslie ACT 2602 Mobile: 0417 293 603 > Australia > ---------------------------------------------------------- > > > > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org > with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message -- STATE-OF-THE-ART: Any computer you can't afford. OBSOLETE: Any computer you own. ________________________________________________________________ FreeBSD - The Power To Serve http://www.freebsd.org My Webpage http://ukug.uk.freebsd.org/~mark/ mailto:mark@ukug.uk.freebsd.org http://www.radan.com To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message