From owner-freebsd-acpi@FreeBSD.ORG  Tue May 10 06:17:17 2005
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-acpi@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-acpi@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id 6709C16A4EF; Tue, 10 May 2005 06:17:17 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from www.svzserv.kemerovo.su (www.svzserv.kemerovo.su
	[213.184.65.80])	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id 616BC43D58; Tue, 10 May 2005 06:17:16 +0000 (GMT)
	(envelope-from eugen@www.svzserv.kemerovo.su)
Received: from www.svzserv.kemerovo.su (eugen@localhost [127.0.0.1])
	j4A6HDLi005698;	Tue, 10 May 2005 14:17:13 +0800 (KRAST)
	(envelope-from eugen@www.svzserv.kemerovo.su)
Received: (from eugen@localhost)
	by www.svzserv.kemerovo.su (8.13.3/8.13.3/Submit) id j4A6HDpN005697;
	Tue, 10 May 2005 14:17:13 +0800 (KRAST)
	(envelope-from eugen)
Date: Tue, 10 May 2005 14:17:13 +0800
From: Eugene Grosbein <eugen@kuzbass.ru>
To: John Baldwin <jhb@FreeBSD.org>
Message-ID: <20050510061713.GA5437@svzserv.kemerovo.su>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <200505091416.37378.jhb@FreeBSD.org>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i
cc: freebsd-acpi@FreeBSD.org
Subject: Re: 5.4: pci_link problem on 440BX
X-BeenThere: freebsd-acpi@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1
Precedence: list
List-Id: ACPI and power management development <freebsd-acpi.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-acpi>,
	<mailto:freebsd-acpi-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-acpi>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-acpi@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-acpi-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-acpi>,
	<mailto:freebsd-acpi-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 10 May 2005 06:17:17 -0000

> Are any of the IRQs different when you do use the pci_link code compared to
> the dmesg when you have pci_link disabled?

It seems, no:

--- dmesg_full	Tue May 10 14:02:42 2005
+++ dmesg_no_pci_link	Tue May 10 14:00:59 2005
@@ -20,9 +20,13 @@
 acpi_button0: <Power Button> on acpi0
 pcib0: <ACPI Host-PCI bridge> port 0x5000-0x500f,0x4000-0x4041,0xcf8-0xcff on acpi0
 pci0: <ACPI PCI bus> on pcib0
+pcib0: no PRT entry for 0.7.INTD
+pcib0: no PRT entry for 0.16.INTA
+pcib0: no PRT entry for 0.18.INTA
 agp0: <Intel 82443BX (440 BX) host to PCI bridge> mem 0xe8000000-0xebffffff at device 0.0 on pci0
 pcib1: <PCI-PCI bridge> at device 1.0 on pci0
 pci1: <PCI bus> on pcib1
+pcib0: no PRT entry for 0.1.INTA
 pci1: <display, VGA> at device 0.0 (no driver attached)
 pci1: <display> at device 0.1 (no driver attached)
 isab0: <PCI-ISA bridge> at device 7.0 on pci0
@@ -77,7 +81,7 @@
 vga0: <Generic ISA VGA> at port 0x3c0-0x3df iomem 0xa0000-0xbffff on isa0
 uhid0: American Power Conversion Back-UPS 500 FW: 6.5.I USB FW: c1, rev 1.10/1.00, addr 2, iclass 3/0
 uscanner0: Hewlett-Packard HP ScanJet 2200C, rev 1.10/1.00, addr 3
-Timecounter "TSC" frequency 902036645 Hz quality 800
+Timecounter "TSC" frequency 902037834 Hz quality 800
 Timecounters tick every 10.000 msec
 ipfw2 initialized, divert enabled, rule-based forwarding disabled, default to deny, logging unlimited
 acd0: DVDR <NEC DVD RW ND-3500AG/2.18> at ata0-master UDMA33


Eugene Grosbein