From owner-freebsd-scsi@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Oct 27 18:15:19 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-scsi@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-scsi@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2012916A47E for ; Fri, 27 Oct 2006 18:15:19 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mjacob@freebsd.org) Received: from ns1.feral.com (ns1.feral.com [192.67.166.1]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 393A643D70 for ; Fri, 27 Oct 2006 18:15:06 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from mjacob@freebsd.org) Received: from ns1.feral.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ns1.feral.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id k9RIEual061401 for ; Fri, 27 Oct 2006 11:14:56 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from mjacob@freebsd.org) Received: from localhost (mjacob@localhost) by ns1.feral.com (8.13.8/8.13.8/Submit) with ESMTP id k9RIEuE2061398 for ; Fri, 27 Oct 2006 11:14:56 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from mjacob@freebsd.org) X-Authentication-Warning: ns1.feral.com: mjacob owned process doing -bs Date: Fri, 27 Oct 2006 11:14:56 -0700 (PDT) From: mjacob@freebsd.org X-X-Sender: mjacob@ns1.feral.com To: freebsd-scsi@freebsd.org In-Reply-To: <45423AB5.3020503@samsco.org> Message-ID: <20061027111434.E61368@ns1.feral.com> References: <20061027090957.V60559@ns1.feral.com> <45423AB5.3020503@samsco.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Subject: Re: CAM_NEW_TRAN X-BeenThere: freebsd-scsi@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: mjacob@freebsd.org List-Id: SCSI subsystem List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 27 Oct 2006 18:15:19 -0000 I can take on most of the work. > mjacob@freebsd.org wrote: >> >> Is there any reason to *not* proceed with CAM_NEW_TRAN and just bite the >> bullet now and move ahead? >> > > I have no objection against it. > > Scott >