From owner-freebsd-hackers Thu Jun 1 20:26:00 1995 Return-Path: hackers-owner Received: (from majordom@localhost) by freefall.cdrom.com (8.6.10/8.6.6) id UAA28412 for hackers-outgoing; Thu, 1 Jun 1995 20:26:00 -0700 Received: from leo.ibms.sinica.edu.tw ([140.109.40.249]) by freefall.cdrom.com (8.6.10/8.6.6) with ESMTP id UAA28394 for ; Thu, 1 Jun 1995 20:25:51 -0700 Received: (from taob@localhost) by leo.ibms.sinica.edu.tw (8.6.11/8.6.9) id LAA00436; Fri, 2 Jun 1995 11:25:37 +0800 Date: Fri, 2 Jun 1995 11:25:37 +0800 (CST) From: Brian Tao To: FREEBSD-HACKERS-L Subject: libdescrypt.a now standard? Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: hackers-owner@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk From the 2.0.5-ALPHA/compat20/compat20.tgz file on the Taiwan mirror (netbsd.csie.nctu.edu.tw): # tar -ztvf compat20.tgz | grep des lrwxr-xr-x bin/bin 0 Feb 26 09:58 1995 usr/lib/libcrypt.so.2.0 -> libdescrypt.so.2.0 -r--r--r-- bin/bin 14039 Jan 26 03:06 1995 usr/lib/libdescrypt.so.2.0 Shouldn't compat20.tgz contain only the MD5 routines and have libcrypt.so.2. linked to libscrypt.so.2.0 by default? I nearly got nailed after a rdist'd the /etc/passwd and /etc/master.passwd from one of the other pre-2.0.5 machines and pwd_mkdb'd it. Luckily I decided to login as root in another virtual console, and that's when I discovered it was using DES. /usr/lib/libcrypt.a is still correctly symlinked to /usr/lib/libscrypt.a (from the bindist, I guess). -- Brian ("Though this be madness, yet there is method in't") Tao taob@gate.sinica.edu.tw <-- work ........ play --> taob@io.org