From owner-cvs-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Aug 22 11:01:11 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: cvs-ports@FreeBSD.org Received: by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix, from userid 1033) id 59B1D1065696; Sun, 22 Aug 2010 11:01:11 +0000 (UTC) Date: Sun, 22 Aug 2010 11:01:11 +0000 From: Alexey Dokuchaev To: Pav Lucistnik Message-ID: <20100822110111.GA58812@FreeBSD.org> References: <201008201215.o7KCF2kA004574@repoman.freebsd.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=koi8-r Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <201008201215.o7KCF2kA004574@repoman.freebsd.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i Cc: cvs-ports@FreeBSD.org, cvs-all@FreeBSD.org, ports-committers@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: ports/Mk bsd.commands.mk bsd.licenses.mk bsd.port.mk X-BeenThere: cvs-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: CVS commit messages for the ports tree List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 22 Aug 2010 11:01:11 -0000 On Fri, Aug 20, 2010 at 12:15:02PM +0000, Pav Lucistnik wrote: > pav 2010-08-20 12:15:02 UTC > > FreeBSD ports repository > > Modified files: > Mk bsd.commands.mk bsd.licenses.mk > bsd.port.mk > Log: > - Provide end-user DISABLE_LICENSES knob to disable licensing framework > > PR: ports/149070 > Submitted by: amdmi3 I'm curious what are essential differences between not defining any LICENSE and using DISABLE_LICENSES? I understand that it supposedly allows to disable license auditing framework completely, but showing the case when simply omitting LICENSE != DISABLE_LICENSES would be nice. ./danfe