From owner-freebsd-hackers Sun Jan 4 12:01:10 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.7/8.8.7) id MAA19741 for hackers-outgoing; Sun, 4 Jan 1998 12:01:10 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from dyson.iquest.net (dyson.iquest.net [198.70.144.127]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id MAA19695 for ; Sun, 4 Jan 1998 12:00:47 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from toor@dyson.iquest.net) Received: (from root@localhost) by dyson.iquest.net (8.8.8/8.8.8) id PAA00937; Sun, 4 Jan 1998 15:00:08 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from toor) Message-Id: <199801042000.PAA00937@dyson.iquest.net> Subject: Re: Process wedge in 'inode' In-Reply-To: <199801041241.NAA00536@peedub.muc.de> from Gary Jennejohn at "Jan 4, 98 01:41:51 pm" To: garyj@muc.de Date: Sun, 4 Jan 1998 15:00:08 -0500 (EST) Cc: freebsd-hackers@freefall.FreeBSD.org From: "John S. Dyson" Reply-To: dyson@FreeBSD.ORG X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4ME+ PL31 (25)] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk Gary Jennejohn said: > > this seems a little extreme, John. I'm running a -current kernel from > today with $Id: ufs_readwrite.c,v 1.38 1997/12/29 01:03:50 dyson Exp $ > and it's just fine. > > The worst breakage was fixed in 1.37 to ufs_readwrite.c, seems to me. > > Just my experience. > I am really trying to warn people that using it in any kind of production is likely to cause severe problems. If it works okay for you, then be gentle to it :-). -- John | Never try to teach a pig to sing, dyson@freebsd.org | it just makes you look stupid, jdyson@nc.com | and it irritates the pig.