From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Nov 18 21:16:50 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 26C7A106566B for ; Fri, 18 Nov 2011 21:16:50 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from perryh@pluto.rain.com) Received: from agora.rdrop.com (agora.rdrop.com [IPv6:2607:f678:1010::34]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 056F28FC0C for ; Fri, 18 Nov 2011 21:16:49 +0000 (UTC) Received: from agora.rdrop.com (66@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by agora.rdrop.com (8.13.1/8.12.7) with ESMTP id pAILGmri042502 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NOT); Fri, 18 Nov 2011 13:16:49 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from perryh@pluto.rain.com) Received: (from uucp@localhost) by agora.rdrop.com (8.13.1/8.12.9/Submit) with UUCP id pAILGmfX042501; Fri, 18 Nov 2011 13:16:48 -0800 (PST) Received: from fbsd81 ([192.168.200.81]) by pluto.rain.com (4.1/SMI-4.1-pluto-M2060407) id AA06578; Fri, 18 Nov 11 13:08:41 PST Date: Fri, 18 Nov 2011 20:08:23 -0800 From: perryh@pluto.rain.com To: kirk@strauser.com Message-Id: <4ec72bb7.60UNRXR3r2vSHeGC%perryh@pluto.rain.com> References: <201111181727.pAIHR9XZ057564@mail.r-bonomi.com> <92484812-3407-4A4B-B1BB-E0B5F3EDD06C@strauser.com> In-Reply-To: <92484812-3407-4A4B-B1BB-E0B5F3EDD06C@strauser.com> User-Agent: nail 11.25 7/29/05 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org, bonomi@mail.r-bonomi.com Subject: Re: Shouldn't GNU tar be ignoring /proc with --one-file-system? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 18 Nov 2011 21:16:50 -0000 Kirk Strauser wrote: > On Nov 18, 2011, at 11:27 AM, Robert Bonomi wrote: > > > See the output of 'mount(8)' for the names of all the mounted > > filesystems on your machine. > > $ mount | grep proc > procfs on /proc (procfs, local) > > > *NOTE*WELL* that '/proc' is *not* a separate filesystem. It > > is merely a _directory_ with a bunch of 'special' files in it. > > I'm confused here. In what way isn't /proc a separate filesystem? > It's even called "procfs". It's Bonomi who is confused. I suspect he doesn't have procfs configured -- so of course its mountpoint is just a directory -- *on his system*. The OP _does_ have procfs configured, or the question wouldn't have arisen.