From owner-freebsd-bugs Tue Apr 30 10:10: 8 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-bugs@hub.freebsd.org Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.FreeBSD.org [216.136.204.21]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DC82437B41B for ; Tue, 30 Apr 2002 10:10:02 -0700 (PDT) Received: (from gnats@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.11.6/8.11.6) id g3UHA2e78851; Tue, 30 Apr 2002 10:10:02 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from gnats) Date: Tue, 30 Apr 2002 10:10:02 -0700 (PDT) Message-Id: <200204301710.g3UHA2e78851@freefall.freebsd.org> To: freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.org Cc: From: Mark Valentine Subject: Re: kern/22866: INET6 sockets which are INET compatible lose packets Reply-To: Mark Valentine Sender: owner-freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.org The following reply was made to PR kern/22866; it has been noted by GNATS. From: Mark Valentine To: Jean-Luc.Richier@imag.fr, FreeBSD-gnats-submit@freebsd.org Cc: Subject: Re: kern/22866: INET6 sockets which are INET compatible lose packets Date: Tue, 30 Apr 2002 18:03:47 +0100 (BST) I wrote: > FreeBSD-CURRENT now seems to have some similar code to that in the > submitted patch applied. Is there still a problem? My apologies, I misread the code. I don't think this issue has been addressed. It may be more effective to take it up directly with the KAME folks. Cheers, Mark. -- Mark Valentine, Thuvia Labs "Tigers will do ANYTHING for a tuna fish sandwich." Mark Valentine uses "We're kind of stupid that way." *munch* *munch* and endorses FreeBSD -- To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-bugs" in the body of the message