From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Dec 11 22:56:42 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CFAAA619; Thu, 11 Dec 2014 22:56:42 +0000 (UTC) Received: from woozle.rinet.ru (woozle.rinet.ru [195.54.192.68]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4BEED98; Thu, 11 Dec 2014 22:56:41 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by woozle.rinet.ru (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id sBBMuFMA033464; Fri, 12 Dec 2014 01:56:15 +0300 (MSK) (envelope-from marck@rinet.ru) Date: Fri, 12 Dec 2014 01:56:15 +0300 (MSK) From: Dmitry Morozovsky To: Mathieu Arnold Subject: Re: Frequency of FreeBSD package builds In-Reply-To: <307D7D309A871FC7AB3405E1@ogg.in.absolight.net> Message-ID: References: <548428C7.2050800@club-internet.fr> <307D7D309A871FC7AB3405E1@ogg.in.absolight.net> User-Agent: Alpine 2.00 (BSF 1167 2008-08-23) X-NCC-RegID: ru.rinet X-OpenPGP-Key-ID: 6B691B03 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.4.3 (woozle.rinet.ru [0.0.0.0]); Fri, 12 Dec 2014 01:56:15 +0300 (MSK) Cc: freebsd-pkg@freebsd.org, freebsd-questions@freebsd.org, =?ISO-8859-15?Q?Juan_Ram=F3n_Molina_Menor?= X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 11 Dec 2014 22:56:42 -0000 Mat, On Mon, 8 Dec 2014, Mathieu Arnold wrote: > | Now that the new_xorg and ssp repositories are not being updated any > | more, what is the reason for the 'beefy' machines to build ports only > | once a week? Can we expect the frequency of package upgrades to be higher > | soon? > > Right now, it does take 3 to 4 days to build the packages each week, so > it's a bit hard to make it more often than once a week. We have plans for > the future, with more building machines, it will be announced when it > happens. Am I right supposing that each build is a full one? What are the downsides of incremental builds which should take less than, say, 2 days (if not deepest beats like gettext updates involved)? -- Sincerely, D.Marck [DM5020, MCK-RIPE, DM3-RIPN] [ FreeBSD committer: marck@FreeBSD.org ] ------------------------------------------------------------------------ *** Dmitry Morozovsky --- D.Marck --- Wild Woozle --- marck@rinet.ru *** ------------------------------------------------------------------------