From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Feb 1 06:02:24 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3978616A419 for ; Fri, 1 Feb 2008 06:02:24 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from deischen@freebsd.org) Received: from mail.netplex.net (mail.netplex.net [204.213.176.10]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EF16C13C461 for ; Fri, 1 Feb 2008 06:02:23 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from deischen@freebsd.org) Received: from sea.ntplx.net (sea.ntplx.net [204.213.176.11]) by mail.netplex.net (8.14.2/8.14.2/NETPLEX) with ESMTP id m115kGSB017268; Fri, 1 Feb 2008 00:46:16 -0500 (EST) X-Virus-Scanned: by AMaViS and Clam AntiVirus (mail.netplex.net) X-Greylist: Message whitelisted by DRAC access database, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.0 (mail.netplex.net [204.213.176.10]); Fri, 01 Feb 2008 00:46:16 -0500 (EST) Date: Fri, 1 Feb 2008 00:46:16 -0500 (EST) From: Daniel Eischen X-X-Sender: eischen@sea.ntplx.net To: Julian Elischer In-Reply-To: <47A290E7.4040900@elischer.org> Message-ID: References: <47A21ED6.5070303@elischer.org> <47A25206.6070406@delphij.net> <47A25993.6050200@elischer.org> <47A25CED.4010504@delphij.net> <47A26D12.30205@elischer.org> <47A27AF3.2020701@delphij.net> <47A27C08.3010709@elischer.org> <47A28023.9000105@delphij.net> <47A290E7.4040900@elischer.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Cc: d@delphij.net, FreeBSD Current Subject: Re: needs a tester with an SMP 7.0 box X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: Daniel Eischen List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 01 Feb 2008 06:02:24 -0000 On Thu, 31 Jan 2008, Julian Elischer wrote: > Xin LI wrote: >> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- >> Hash: SHA1 >> >> Julian Elischer wrote: >>>> I'm not sure why, but a fresh RELENG_7_0 with your patch, plus DDB >>>> enabled does not trigger the problem :-/ >>>> >>> what happens without the patch? >> >> No, I mean that it used to crash with previous kernel which is built >> only a couple of days ago, no more than a week. You want me to test the >> case without patch? >> > > We need to detirmine > 1/ whether there is a problem in 7.0 in the first place. if not, we are done. > > 2/ whether the patch fixes it if there is a problem. I think it's safe to say that it _is_ a potential problem in both -current, 7.0 and 6.x. I committed it to -current without trying to duplicate the problem. -- DE