From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG  Fri Jul 20 23:52:26 2012
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 15C7A1065670;
	Fri, 20 Jul 2012 23:52:26 +0000 (UTC)
	(envelope-from jkim@FreeBSD.org)
Received: from hammer.pct.niksun.com (freefall.freebsd.org
	[IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::28])
	by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A05108FC17;
	Fri, 20 Jul 2012 23:52:25 +0000 (UTC)
Message-ID: <5009EF39.6000406@FreeBSD.org>
Date: Fri, 20 Jul 2012 19:52:25 -0400
From: Jung-uk Kim <jkim@FreeBSD.org>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64;
	rv:13.0) Gecko/20120626 Thunderbird/13.0.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Dimitry Andric <dim@freebsd.org>
References: <vyh5gfyc7ro596rvdbv95tih.1342623265060@email.android.com>
	<5006F780.2020004@FreeBSD.org> <44k3y1ndlp.fsf@be-well.ilk.org>
	<50073701.80205@FreeBSD.org> <500747F2.8010900@FreeBSD.org>
	<500809DA.1030301@FreeBSD.org> <50084CFA.9090802@gmail.com>
	<50085B54.2040005@FreeBSD.org> <500861D6.1070001@FreeBSD.org>
In-Reply-To: <500861D6.1070001@FreeBSD.org>
X-Enigmail-Version: 1.4.2
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: Baptiste Daroussin <bapt@freebsd.org>, freebsd-ports@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: [FYI] C++ compilers vs. __cplusplus (was Re: SV: Re: make failed
 for editors/libreoffice)
X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD <freebsd-ports.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports>,
	<mailto:freebsd-ports-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-ports>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-ports@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-ports-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports>,
	<mailto:freebsd-ports-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 20 Jul 2012 23:52:26 -0000

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On 2012-07-19 15:36:54 -0400, Jung-uk Kim wrote:
> On 2012-07-19 15:09:08 -0400, Dimitry Andric wrote:
>> Btw, does anybody know *why* the LibreOffice port attempts to 
>> compile everything as C++0x or C++11?   Is it really using those 
>> features?
> 
> It is using some of its features, I guess:
> 
> ifeq ($(HAVE_CXX0X),TRUE) #Currently, as well as for its own
> merits, c++11/c++0x mode allows use to use #a template for
> SAL_N_ELEMENTS to detect at compiler time its misuse gb_CXXFLAGS +=
> -std=c++0x ...
> 
> I don't know the impact of turning it off, however.  Some time ago,
> I tried to forcefully turning it off but I wasn't able to make it
> work on all releases at the time.

More investigation showed that it was added because Boost 1.48 had
serious regression:

http://cgit.freedesktop.org/libreoffice/bootstrap/commit/?h=libreoffice-3-4&id=9c2ab9f4febec2b2c5fac25469f1d0cfedc6af5e

It seems to be related to this Boost issue:

https://svn.boost.org/trac/boost/ticket/6167

Jung-uk Kim
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2.0.19 (FreeBSD)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/

iEYEARECAAYFAlAJ7zkACgkQmlay1b9qnVOZVgCghuywlMgsr7nTiGTpSwWJpquN
bL4AoJEs2L4wqSdlRsUps1vPvkX+TvrO
=5/X9
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----