From owner-freebsd-x11@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jul 21 22:11:21 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-x11@FreeBSD.org Delivered-To: freebsd-x11@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D89DE16A423 for ; Thu, 21 Jul 2005 22:11:21 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from jkim@FreeBSD.org) Received: from anuket.mj.niksun.com (gwnew.niksun.com [65.115.46.162]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 30ADD43D88 for ; Thu, 21 Jul 2005 22:11:05 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from jkim@FreeBSD.org) Received: from niksun.com (anuket [10.70.0.5]) by anuket.mj.niksun.com (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id j6LMCwsU056394; Thu, 21 Jul 2005 18:12:58 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from jkim@FreeBSD.org) From: Jung-uk Kim To: freebsd-x11@FreeBSD.org Date: Thu, 21 Jul 2005 18:10:42 -0400 User-Agent: KMail/1.6.2 References: <20050719100314.GA20584@users.altadena.net> <1121904708.4260.51.camel@leguin> <20050721091705.GA5341@users.altadena.net> In-Reply-To: <20050721091705.GA5341@users.altadena.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <200507211810.46474.jkim@FreeBSD.org> X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV 0.85.1/987/Thu Jul 21 10:57:41 2005 on anuket.mj.niksun.com X-Virus-Status: Clean Cc: Pete Carah Subject: Re: New compaq, new radeon id X-BeenThere: freebsd-x11@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: X11 on FreeBSD -- maintaining and support List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 21 Jul 2005 22:11:22 -0000 On Thursday 21 July 2005 05:17 am, Pete Carah wrote: > At the moment, I tried xorg-server-snap. It is now recognized, and > X -probeonly appears to work but if I try to actually bring up > anything in a real X server the system waits about a second then > reboots. (hard to debug that kind of thing without an ICE :-( (and > I don't even know if ICE's exist for A64's) (and further, I > couldn't possibly afford one if they do exist :-(. > > Patching drm to recognize the chip is easy; I did this but only got > reboots whenever I tried X (note, however, that I get them without > this patch too). I don't know if just recognition is adequate or > there needs to be something else done too? Do you have /var/log/Xorg.0.log? If you do, can you send it to me? dmesg and your patch will be nice too. BTW, PCI-Express GART support is extremely experimental. > agp_amd64 has no ATI stuff mentioned in the source; only nvidia, > AMD, and via. Like I said in the previous e-mail, you won't need agp(4) at all. > I don't konw about agp_ati For now I'll wait somewhat patiently > (or look and see if agp_ati is remotely near. It isn't in my > source tree (cvsup HEAD as of early tonight)). That's not committed yet because we don't have any hardware to test. Jung-uk Kim > -- Pete