From owner-freebsd-current Thu Jun 13 22:26:37 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from dan.emsphone.com (dan.emsphone.com [199.67.51.101]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DAA8F37B412; Thu, 13 Jun 2002 22:26:34 -0700 (PDT) Received: (from dan@localhost) by dan.emsphone.com (8.12.3/8.12.3) id g5E5QOax071851; Fri, 14 Jun 2002 00:26:24 -0500 (CDT) (envelope-from dan) Date: Fri, 14 Jun 2002 00:26:24 -0500 From: Dan Nelson To: Doug Barton Cc: freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: "cost" of vidcontrol -m ? Message-ID: <20020614052624.GG34783@dan.emsphone.com> References: <3D097E0C.DBB66DAD@FreeBSD.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <3D097E0C.DBB66DAD@FreeBSD.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.99i X-OS: FreeBSD 5.0-CURRENT X-message-flag: Outlook Error Sender: owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG In the last episode (Jun 13), Doug Barton said: > http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=conf/39125 presents an > interesting hypothesis, namely that vidcontrol -m ought to be enabled > by default in usbd.conf. I tend to agree with that premise, but > before I commit it I was curious as to what the "cost" of doing this > would be. Specifically, I have a usb mouse, but I spend almost all my > time in X, so when I need the copy/paste stuff in the console, I just > run vidcontrol by hand. It would be more convenient to have it "just > work," but I'd hate to screw over low resource users in the proces... If the mouse is not moving, I can't imagine it has any cost. -- Dan Nelson dnelson@allantgroup.com To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message