From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Apr 23 18:05:28 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 18D89515 for ; Wed, 23 Apr 2014 18:05:28 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-ob0-x22e.google.com (mail-ob0-x22e.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4003:c01::22e]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CF2081554 for ; Wed, 23 Apr 2014 18:05:27 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-ob0-f174.google.com with SMTP id gq1so1425417obb.19 for ; Wed, 23 Apr 2014 11:05:27 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=references:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:cc:from:subject:date:to; bh=/FDlFU4R9fzltkTKEQrhMU1knFqoOEDrwroPZdd5V1I=; b=zFv/gPas4j6BQauEGk+j6iknKFfABiP9Xn4eHWedCR2nc1KhUxVj6jxZswTcnICVkJ q5tuOLRqFyqM8SWqxMuin+6HgzvOtG6hevtltbonY4WQP1zcHL221/NDzdf96IMKUeVs arovm5KfAvfdQFh6rZtAAnSiui3pFaBky867O19YLoJ9yM8oWP27J59LDXD34SQo3lNU S8ew8wm2JnqnHl5IuLX7lt2kDwtvGoq6w3jC3SlPvPO+ol3a1xki3I5Y5l00J2s0uK4r 5QAQ4/4dsgHsibqzS8eSniUj0ZPJ5e148i1ezMCnTKBC2GmRXpMt9m4cPQ6QMvLgimHW m23w== X-Received: by 10.60.62.178 with SMTP id z18mr3090307oer.61.1398276322525; Wed, 23 Apr 2014 11:05:22 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [192.168.1.64] (pool-71-170-112-253.dllstx.fios.verizon.net. [71.170.112.253]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id cq1sm6711937oeb.4.2014.04.23.11.05.21 for (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Wed, 23 Apr 2014 11:05:21 -0700 (PDT) References: <201404222302.s3MN2brb059084@fire.js.berklix.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 (1.0) In-Reply-To: <201404222302.s3MN2brb059084@fire.js.berklix.net> Message-Id: <35070175-6154-4234-934E-B94DA5175667@gmail.com> X-Mailer: iPad Mail (11D167) From: Matthew Pherigo Subject: Re: FBSD jail versus VMWare? What services do YOU run in a jail? Date: Wed, 23 Apr 2014 13:05:20 -0500 To: "Julian H. Stacey" Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.17 Cc: "edflecko ." , "freebsd-questions@freebsd.org" X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 23 Apr 2014 18:05:28 -0000 > On Apr 22, 2014, at 6:02 PM, "Julian H. Stacey" wrote: >=20 > less flexibility (eg No linux jail in a FreeBSD prison) As a matter of fact, you CAN run a Linux environment in a jail by using the L= inux compatibility layer on the host. Of course, this means that there may b= e some kernel features missing, or bugs, but at least you have that option. Here's an article with one way of doing it: http://devil-detail.blogspot.com= /2013/08/debian-linux-freebsd-jail-zfs.html --Matt=