From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Aug 24 19:38:20 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D45E52C5 for ; Sat, 24 Aug 2013 19:38:20 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kostikbel@gmail.com) Received: from kib.kiev.ua (kib.kiev.ua [IPv6:2001:470:d5e7:1::1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 445092F51 for ; Sat, 24 Aug 2013 19:38:20 +0000 (UTC) Received: from tom.home (kostik@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by kib.kiev.ua (8.14.7/8.14.7) with ESMTP id r7OJcEkm020285; Sat, 24 Aug 2013 22:38:14 +0300 (EEST) (envelope-from kostikbel@gmail.com) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.8.3 kib.kiev.ua r7OJcEkm020285 Received: (from kostik@localhost) by tom.home (8.14.7/8.14.7/Submit) id r7OJcEoO020284; Sat, 24 Aug 2013 22:38:14 +0300 (EEST) (envelope-from kostikbel@gmail.com) X-Authentication-Warning: tom.home: kostik set sender to kostikbel@gmail.com using -f Date: Sat, 24 Aug 2013 22:38:14 +0300 From: Konstantin Belousov To: J David Subject: Re: NFS deadlock on 9.2-Beta1 Message-ID: <20130824193814.GR4972@kib.kiev.ua> References: <158996730.12825374.1377265437471.JavaMail.root@uoguelph.ca> <20130824174103.GQ4972@kib.kiev.ua> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="p8FzsPJm/2uX5Pc/" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,BAYES_00, DKIM_ADSP_CUSTOM_MED,FREEMAIL_FROM,NML_ADSP_CUSTOM_MED autolearn=no version=3.3.2 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.2 (2011-06-06) on tom.home Cc: Rick Macklem , freebsd-stable X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 24 Aug 2013 19:38:20 -0000 --p8FzsPJm/2uX5Pc/ Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Sat, Aug 24, 2013 at 02:03:50PM -0400, J David wrote: > On Sat, Aug 24, 2013 at 1:41 PM, Konstantin Belousov > wrote: > > I think the easiest route is to a partial merge of the r253927 from HEA= D. >=20 > Is it helpful if we restart testing releng/9.2 using your suggested > fix? And if so, the IGN_SBUSY patch you posted earlier be applied as > well or no? No, at least not without reverting the r254754 first. The IGN_SBUSY patch is not critical there. >=20 > If it ran successfully on a bunch of machines for next few days, maybe > that would still be in time to be useful feedback for 9.2. >=20 > Thanks! --p8FzsPJm/2uX5Pc/ Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.21 (FreeBSD) iQIcBAEBAgAGBQJSGQulAAoJEJDCuSvBvK1BRCQP/i84oARhtr3bFZhZZtRcV+o6 bo0eEw88iApoLHZOB3rOblWPy/KlYh/AyobrRu/oO09lDQBY40W8GvtxQInG1GSF +fJ0iNrDh1LFLcantzH4rzZn/f+8Nq1Ef/aAEVcAM8CR0fXYn1mMdjFHsCLhgFPH KFwYkjROdidTtcjuoLK7k+5MezIyE6BHY9xhJjELl7Gmn9ZioBU0CQvNFE7UBZma 9B3p+MPNX8P3nwKgRsU7vlFt5uXuy1sflD55sNdFNkeeywqnwD3hCpyYcHaH7bLp W4HrlwAQJQRUXBqhPUUAkJ1OXR+DygbTACnSKCQlrEQk73sdQU7pYTcKZ7ziRhZz szf/dpJeTwBLJmU/anjHu7sCbKaORMEMT9ohQCbFR1qWnPA9/yXJbeImUfC+4P27 vYRaVs4ghv2tEFOHE/5ZPXYwkiKSktgI1P1kWzbGeArPzlcPIm78dI3BncWhurBr WoBz33em0N30l3mDiIv5/YMYBK10x3fKESbQ8JAGRq0hwMh5aiT6pgzvvw+8GWLW UJ3ML5fz4g2dd87hLHA7BzOBatahidRTpMPg+dM9emzJ8xGHoBFzRXe7I/i48mB+ g9IQq+Whc9K59mw+IJQEnry217mRYmXoRPkpthsTEN5jM34d+XEFPu3gvlC0MGLZ QZ8n3pzZ252b6w8B1k7s =r6V4 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --p8FzsPJm/2uX5Pc/--