From owner-freebsd-doc@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jan 31 21:07:52 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-doc@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D1CEB106564A; Tue, 31 Jan 2012 21:07:52 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from wblock@wonkity.com) Received: from wonkity.com (wonkity.com [67.158.26.137]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 917218FC0C; Tue, 31 Jan 2012 21:07:52 +0000 (UTC) Received: from wonkity.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by wonkity.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id q0VL7pWC098063; Tue, 31 Jan 2012 14:07:51 -0700 (MST) (envelope-from wblock@wonkity.com) Received: from localhost (wblock@localhost) by wonkity.com (8.14.5/8.14.5/Submit) with ESMTP id q0VL7pGr098060; Tue, 31 Jan 2012 14:07:51 -0700 (MST) (envelope-from wblock@wonkity.com) Date: Tue, 31 Jan 2012 14:07:51 -0700 (MST) From: Warren Block To: Benedict Reuschling In-Reply-To: <4F285145.9030505@FreeBSD.org> Message-ID: References: <20120131104953.GA55314@freefall.freebsd.org> <4F285145.9030505@FreeBSD.org> User-Agent: Alpine 2.00 (BSF 1167 2008-08-23) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.2.7 (wonkity.com [127.0.0.1]); Tue, 31 Jan 2012 14:07:52 -0700 (MST) Cc: freebsd-doc@freebsd.org Subject: Re: New Handbook Section for Review - graid3 X-BeenThere: freebsd-doc@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Documentation project List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 31 Jan 2012 21:07:52 -0000 On Tue, 31 Jan 2012, Benedict Reuschling wrote: > + > + While it is theoretically possible to boot from > + RAID3 array on &os;, such configuration > + is not common and is not advised. As such, this section > + does not provide description of how to accomplish such > + configuration. > + > > How about reducing the "such" word count in the last sentence? How about > "... of how to accomplish this kind of configuration." or "... this type > of configuration." ? I suggested While it is theoretically possible to boot from a RAID3 array on &os;, such a configuration is not common and is not advised. As such, this section does not describe how to accomplish that configuration. That still could be better. While it is theoretically possible to boot from a RAID3 array on &os;, that configuration is uncommon and not advised. As such, this section does not describe how to accomplish it. Actually, the last sentence is kind of a "this page intentionally left blank": While it is theoretically possible to boot from a RAID3 array on &os;, that configuration is uncommon and not advised.