From owner-freebsd-hackers Thu Dec 7 14:16:46 1995 Return-Path: owner-hackers Received: (from root@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.3/8.7.3) id OAA27069 for hackers-outgoing; Thu, 7 Dec 1995 14:16:46 -0800 (PST) Received: from Root.COM (implode.Root.COM [198.145.90.17]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.3/8.7.3) with SMTP id OAA27048 Thu, 7 Dec 1995 14:16:38 -0800 (PST) Received: from corbin.Root.COM (corbin [198.145.90.50]) by Root.COM (8.6.12/8.6.5) with ESMTP id OAA06798; Thu, 7 Dec 1995 14:16:36 -0800 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by corbin.Root.COM (8.6.12/8.6.5) with SMTP id OAA06221; Thu, 7 Dec 1995 14:17:22 -0800 Message-Id: <199512072217.OAA06221@corbin.Root.COM> To: Terry Lambert cc: root@buffnet.net (Steve Hovey), jau@jau.csc.fi, questions@freebsd.org, hackers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Any operational code using mmap() on FreeBSD ? In-reply-to: Your message of "Thu, 07 Dec 95 11:29:02 MST." <199512071829.LAA05180@phaeton.artisoft.com> From: David Greenman Reply-To: davidg@Root.COM Date: Thu, 07 Dec 1995 14:17:20 -0800 Sender: owner-hackers@freebsd.org Precedence: bulk >The question is what are the failure modes on 2.1. If there aren't any, >you should upgrade to resolve the problem. If there are, and they are >more severe, you should report them to be corrected, since 2.1 *is* >being maintained (in the form of the 2.2-current). Uh, actually, 2.1 is being maintained seperately from 2.2-current. -DG