From owner-freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Mar 13 18:20:01 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports-bugs@smarthost.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8C2A3E1E for ; Thu, 13 Mar 2014 18:20:01 +0000 (UTC) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206c::16:87]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 78D96C7C for ; Thu, 13 Mar 2014 18:20:01 +0000 (UTC) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.14.8/8.14.8) with ESMTP id s2DIK1Xl008888 for ; Thu, 13 Mar 2014 18:20:01 GMT (envelope-from gnats@freefall.freebsd.org) Received: (from gnats@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.14.8/8.14.8/Submit) id s2DIK1qw008887; Thu, 13 Mar 2014 18:20:01 GMT (envelope-from gnats) Date: Thu, 13 Mar 2014 18:20:01 GMT Message-Id: <201403131820.s2DIK1qw008887@freefall.freebsd.org> To: freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org Cc: From: "Jeremy C. Reed" Subject: Re: ports/187423: [PATCH] devel/log4cplus: update to 1.1.2 X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports-bugs@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17 Precedence: list Reply-To: "Jeremy C. Reed" List-Id: Ports bug reports List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 13 Mar 2014 18:20:01 -0000 The following reply was made to PR ports/187423; it has been noted by GNATS. From: "Jeremy C. Reed" To: bug-followup@FreeBSD.org Cc: Subject: Re: ports/187423: [PATCH] devel/log4cplus: update to 1.1.2 Date: Thu, 13 Mar 2014 12:51:06 -0500 (CDT) On Mon, 10 Mar 2014, Edwin Groothuis wrote: > Please note that PR ports/187423 has just been submitted. > > If it contains a patch for an upgrade, an enhancement or a bug fix > you agree on, reply to this email stating that you approve the patch > and a committer will take care of it. I didn't test it. But I looked at it and it appears correct and fine. I am fine with having it committed. Thanks