From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Oct 14 15:20:12 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: current@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D75B416A4C2 for ; Sat, 14 Oct 2006 15:20:12 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from xdivac02@stud.fit.vutbr.cz) Received: from eva.fit.vutbr.cz (eva.fit.vutbr.cz [147.229.176.14]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 020B143DEA for ; Sat, 14 Oct 2006 15:19:35 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from xdivac02@stud.fit.vutbr.cz) Received: from eva.fit.vutbr.cz (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by eva.fit.vutbr.cz (envelope-from xdivac02@eva.fit.vutbr.cz) (8.13.8/8.13.7) with ESMTP id k9EFJIGB008567 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Sat, 14 Oct 2006 17:19:18 +0200 (CEST) Received: (from xdivac02@localhost) by eva.fit.vutbr.cz (8.13.8/8.13.3/Submit) id k9EFJIjf008566; Sat, 14 Oct 2006 17:19:18 +0200 (CEST) Date: Sat, 14 Oct 2006 17:19:18 +0200 From: Divacky Roman To: LI Xin Message-ID: <20061014151918.GA8459@stud.fit.vutbr.cz> References: <20061013162450.GA29904@stud.fit.vutbr.cz> <452FC183.4040104@delphij.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <452FC183.4040104@delphij.net> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.2i X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.57 on 147.229.176.14 Cc: current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: gzip in base system X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 14 Oct 2006 15:20:12 -0000 On Sat, Oct 14, 2006 at 12:40:35AM +0800, LI Xin wrote: > Divacky Roman wrote: > > hi.. > > > > I noticed gzip version 1.3.5 (at least) was released while our base only > > has 1.2.4 > > > > is this intended or just because noone updated it? > > Where is the announcement? By the way, we are evaluating the > possibility of replacing the GNU gzip with NetBSD's gzip version, which > is implemented with zlib, and is a bit faster than GNU gzip from my test. I found this version browsing www.gzip.org its a bit messy but you can download the sources from there. But if you have other plans I am all for it.. I just wanted to ask. roman