From owner-freebsd-scsi@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Oct 27 18:32:37 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-scsi@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-scsi@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 705CB16A407; Fri, 27 Oct 2006 18:32:37 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ken@nargothrond.kdm.org) Received: from nargothrond.kdm.org (nargothrond.kdm.org [70.56.43.81]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AD39543D55; Fri, 27 Oct 2006 18:32:36 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from ken@nargothrond.kdm.org) Received: from nargothrond.kdm.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by nargothrond.kdm.org (8.13.6/8.13.6) with ESMTP id k9RIWZgq070316; Fri, 27 Oct 2006 12:32:35 -0600 (MDT) (envelope-from ken@nargothrond.kdm.org) Received: (from ken@localhost) by nargothrond.kdm.org (8.13.6/8.13.6/Submit) id k9RIWZtB070315; Fri, 27 Oct 2006 12:32:35 -0600 (MDT) (envelope-from ken) Date: Fri, 27 Oct 2006 12:32:35 -0600 From: "Kenneth D. Merry" To: mjacob@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20061027183235.GA70290@nargothrond.kdm.org> References: <20061027090957.V60559@ns1.feral.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20061027090957.V60559@ns1.feral.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2i X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV 0.88.1/2126/Fri Oct 27 07:48:55 2006 on nargothrond.kdm.org X-Virus-Status: Clean Cc: freebsd-scsi@freebsd.org Subject: Re: CAM_NEW_TRAN X-BeenThere: freebsd-scsi@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: SCSI subsystem List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 27 Oct 2006 18:32:37 -0000 On Fri, Oct 27, 2006 at 09:10:43 -0700, mjacob@freebsd.org wrote: > > Is there any reason to *not* proceed with CAM_NEW_TRAN and just bite the > bullet now and move ahead? I think it's a good idea. We'll need to figure out how to handle the drivers that haven't had the code implemented for them yet. Ken -- Kenneth Merry ken@kdm.org